Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026
Cutaneous Surgical Denervation: A Method for Testing the Requirement for Nerves in Mouse Models of Skin Disease
Published on: June 26, 2016
Involuntary, electrically excitable nerve transfer for denervation: results from an animal model
Daniel Master1, Thomas Cowan, Sreenath Narayan
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. Daniel.mastermd@gmail.com
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of "paralyzed" nerve transfer (ie, transfer of an involuntary, nondegenerated, electrically excitable nerve onto an involuntary, degenerated, non-electrically excitable nerve) and functional electrical stimulation for reinnervation. We hypothesized that lower motor neuron cell body continuity with the motor cortex, via intact upper motor neurons, is not necessary for reinnervation of the extremities.
Methods:
Fischer 344 rats had lower thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI) followed by unilateral tibial nerve transection and delayed peroneal ("paralyzed") to tibial nerve transfer (group A) or primary neurorrhaphy (group B). Control groups had SCI and a unilateral hindlimb incision and nerve exposure only (group C) or a unilateral hindlimb disection and transection of both the tibial and peroneal nerves (group D). Three months after surgery, the proximal peroneal (group A) or proximal tibial (groups B, C, and D) nerves were electrically stimulated in vivo, and gastrocnemius force production was measured on both the operative and nonoperative hindlimbs. In addition, the distal tibial nerves from both the experimental and control-side hindlimbs were sectioned and stained with anti-neurofilament protein to determine total axon counts.
Results:
Mean gastrocnemius force return and mean axonal regeneration was 47% and 51%, respectively, for group A animals (n = 9), 68% and 73% for group B animals (n = 4), 97% and 99% for group C animals (n = 4), and 0 and 2% for group D animals (n = 4). A 1-way analysis of variance for independent samples yielded significant differences between groups A, B, and C for gastrocnemius force return and between all groups for axonal regeneration.
Conclusions:
Paralyzed nerve transfer produces a mean of approximately 50% return of gastrocnemius force and axonal regeneration. Paralyzed nerve transfer combined with functional electrical stimulation is a viable method for reanimating denervated motor units in the setting of SCI.
