Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET
Published on: April 28, 2013
Renal transplant: nonenhanced renal MR angiography with magnetization-prepared steady-state free precession
Xin Liu1, Natasha Berg, John Sheehan
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 737 N Michigan Ave, Suite 1600, Chicago, IL 60611, USA. xin.liu@sub.siat.ac.cn
Abstract:
The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant study and waived informed consent. The purpose was to investigate nonenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography with steady-state free precession (SSFP) with inversion recovery for assessing renal arteries in patients with renal transplants. Thirteen recipients of renal transplants underwent SSFP MR angiography before contrast material-enhanced MR angiography. Three stenoses (two mild, one severe) were identified at SSFP MR angiography in agreement with findings at contrast-enhanced MR angiography. There was no significant difference in image quality between the two methods. Results suggest SSFP MR angiography permits image quality of renal transplant arteries and detection of arterial stenosis comparable with those at contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Insights
Nonenhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography using steady-state free precession (SSFP) with inversion recovery shows comparable image quality and renal artery stenosis detection to contrast-enhanced MR angiography in renal transplant recipients.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Medical Imaging
- Nephrology
Background:
- Renal artery stenosis is a common complication in renal transplant recipients.
- Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) angiography is a standard imaging technique, but concerns exist regarding nephrotoxicity.
- Nonenhanced MR angiography techniques are being explored as safer alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of nonenhanced MR angiography with steady-state free precession (SSFP) and inversion recovery for assessing renal arteries in renal transplant patients.
- To compare the diagnostic performance and image quality of nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Main Methods:
- A prospective study involving thirteen renal transplant recipients.
- All participants underwent nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography followed by contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
- Image quality and the presence of renal artery stenosis were assessed and compared between the two techniques.
Main Results:
- Nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography successfully identified three cases of renal artery stenosis (two mild, one severe).
- Findings from nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography were in agreement with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
- No significant difference in image quality was observed between the nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced methods.
Conclusions:
- Nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography with inversion recovery provides comparable image quality for evaluating renal transplant arteries.
- This nonenhanced technique is effective in detecting renal artery stenosis in renal transplant recipients.
- Nonenhanced SSFP MR angiography represents a viable alternative to contrast-enhanced techniques, potentially reducing risks associated with contrast agents.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI

