Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device01:30

Design Example: Identifying the Locations of Monuments in the Field Using Global Positioning System Device

Surveyors use Global Positioning System (GPS) technology to measure the precise location and elevation of points on Earth. In a recent survey, GPS receivers were used to determine the coordinates and elevations of two park monuments. The process involved careful mission planning, data collection, and correction to ensure accuracy. The survey began with mission planning to identify optimal satellite visibility and minimize Position Dilution of Precision (PDOP). A geodetic control point served as...
Local Attraction01:22

Local Attraction

Local attraction refers to disturbances in compass readings caused by magnetic influences from nearby objects such as metal fences, buried pipes, vehicles, buildings, power lines, or natural iron ore deposits. Small items like wristwatches, steel tools, or belt buckles can also interfere with the compass by creating local magnetic fields that distort the Earth's natural magnetic field. These distortions lead to inaccurate readings, posing navigation and land surveying challenges.Local...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The vigilance decrement: its first 75 years.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

When more isn't better: evidence for an instructional equivalence hypothesis in multimedia design.

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

Does the output form of inhibition of return operate at or after the bottleneck?

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Role of social competence in emotion processing among emerging adults with anxiety.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

Attention to Instagram features in female youth with anxiety symptoms.

Comprehensive psychiatry·2025
Same author

Posner's Endogenous Beam Is (Still) Not Treisman's Glue.

Experimental psychology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment
09:30

Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment

Published on: May 23, 2025

Finding the target in search tasks using detection, localization, and identification responses.

Kristie R Dukewich1, Raymond M Klein

  • 1Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. dukewich@dal.ca

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale
|March 11, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Researchers studying attention should use localization or identification tasks, not detection tasks, when measuring search efficiency. This is because detection tasks yield different error rates and slopes, suggesting they reflect distinct cognitive processes.

More Related Videos

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment
09:30

Localizing Function-specific Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Absence of Navigation Equipment

Published on: May 23, 2025

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets
08:45

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Visual search is a common paradigm for studying attention.
  • It typically involves identifying a target among distractors.
  • While target detection is widely used, its suitability for measuring search efficiency is questioned.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare detection, localization, and identification tasks within a visual search paradigm.
  • To determine which task best reflects search efficiency using identical stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a within-subjects design comparing three visual search tasks: detection, localization, and identification.
  • Utilized identical stimuli across all tasks.
  • Analyzed error rates and search slopes.

Main Results:

  • Detection task showed different error rates and slopes compared to identification and localization.
  • Slopes from identification and localization tasks were significantly correlated.
  • Slopes from the detection task were not significantly correlated with the other two tasks.

Conclusions:

  • Localization and identification tasks are more suitable for estimating visual search efficiency than target detection.
  • Researchers should consider using localization or identification for more accurate assessments of search efficiency.