Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Perceptual Constancy01:12

Perceptual Constancy

Perceptual constancy is the ability to recognize that objects remain consistent and unchanged even when their appearance varies due to changes in sensory input. There are four main types of perceptual constancy: size constancy, shape constancy, color constancy, and brightness constancy.
Size constancy is the recognition that an object remains the same size, even when its image on the retina changes. For instance, a bus is perceived to be large enough to carry people, even if it looks tiny from...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate measurements...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid modulation of choice behavior by ultrasound on the human frontal eye fields.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Influence of panoramic cues during prolonged roll-tilt adaptation on the percept of vertical.

Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation·2021
Same author

Flexible Visuomotor Associations in Touchscreen Control.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2017
Same author

Alpha-band transcranial alternating current stimulation modulates precision, but not gain during whole-body spatial updating.

Neuropsychologia·2017
Same author

Perception of the dynamic visual vertical during sinusoidal linear motion.

Journal of neurophysiology·2017
Same author

Decisions in motion: vestibular contributions to saccadic target selection.

Journal of neurophysiology·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Accuracy-precision trade-off in visual orientation constancy.

M De Vrijer1, W P Medendorp, J A M Van Gisbergen

  • 1Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. m.devrijer@donders.ru.nl

Journal of Vision
|March 11, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study shows that spatial vision errors during head tilt are predicted by a Bayesian model. The model explains how the brain balances visual accuracy and precision for orientation constancy.

More Related Videos

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients
07:06

Binocular Dynamic Visual Acuity in Eyeglass-Corrected Myopic Patients

Published on: March 29, 2022

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
07:24

Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane

Published on: August 22, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Maintaining visual orientation constancy during lateral head tilt is crucial for spatial awareness.
  • Previous studies identified opposing bias effects (A-effect and E-effect) in subjective visual vertical (SVV) performance across different tilt angles.
  • The underlying mechanisms for these SVV error patterns remain incompletely understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if a Bayesian spatial-perception model can explain the observed SVV error patterns (A- and E-effects).
  • To test the hypothesis that SVV errors result from a precision-accuracy trade-off in combining sensory information about head orientation.
  • To evaluate the model's ability to predict human performance in spatial orientation tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Employed a psychometric approach to quantify the accuracy and precision of the subjective visual vertical (SVV).
  • Tested eight human subjects under nine different lateral tilt angles, ranging from -120 to 120 degrees.
  • Fitted the collected SVV data to a Bayesian spatial-perception model.

Main Results:

  • Both SVV accuracy and precision significantly decreased as the magnitude of the lateral tilt angle increased.
  • The observed pattern of worsening accuracy and precision with tilt angle was well-described by the predictions of the Bayesian model.
  • The model successfully accounted for both undercompensation (A-effect) and overcompensation (E-effect) biases.

Conclusions:

  • Spatial vision performance, particularly in tasks like the SVV, adheres to the principles of Bayes' optimal observer theory.
  • Systematic errors in spatial orientation are not arbitrary but reflect an optimal computational strategy balancing precision and accuracy.
  • The Bayesian model provides a robust framework for understanding visual orientation constancy and its limitations under head tilt.