Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Measuring Volatile and Non-volatile Antifungal Activity of Biocontrol Products
Published on: December 5, 2020
Direct contact membrane inoculation of yeasts and moulds for evaluating preservative efficacy in solid cosmetics
1U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (HFF234), 200 C Street, S.W., Washington, DC 20204, USA.
Abstract:
Synopsis A direct contact membrane inoculation technique for yeasts and moulds was used to evaluate the preservation efficacy and antimicrobial activity of Germall 115 and Germall II in pressed eye shadows. Test organisms on membrane filters were placed in direct contact with cosmetics at room temperature under humid conditions. Growth on membranes was removed daily, or as appropriate, and cultured on potato dextrose agar containing lecithin and Tween 80. Linear regression analysis was used to determine product preservation efficacy. Average D values of 1 and 3 days for Candida albicans American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) 10231 and 17 and 29 days for Aspergillus niger ATCC 16404 were obtained on two eye shadows we prepared (in-house eye shadows) with parabens and either Germall II or Germall 115 as preservatives. A decimal reduction time (D value) of 6-7 days was calculated for the yeast on a commercial eye shadow preserved with parabens and Germall 115. A. niger multiplied on six of seven replicates of this commercial product to attain a nearly 3 log(10) increase in 20 days. On one replicate, A. niger showed a 1 log(10) increase in the first 10 days, and then decreased linearly (r =- 0.95) to <10 colony-forming units per membrane by day 24. The method used with C. albicans and A. niger was then used with bacteria. The method was sensitive enough to differentiate the antimicrobial activity of the Germall 115 and Germall II against fungi but not against bacteria. The in-house and commercial products were preserved most effectively against the three bacteria tested and least effectively against the mould.
Insights
This study evaluated preservatives Germall 115 and Germall II in pressed eye shadows. The preservatives showed better efficacy against bacteria than fungi, with variable results for molds.
Area of Science:
- Cosmetic Science
- Microbiology
- Preservative Efficacy
Background:
- Cosmetics require effective preservation against microbial contamination.
- Germall 115 and Germall II are common cosmetic preservatives.
- Pressed eye shadows present unique challenges for preservation due to their formulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the preservation efficacy of Germall 115 and Germall II in pressed eye shadows.
- To assess the antimicrobial activity of these preservatives against fungi and bacteria.
- To compare the efficacy in in-house and commercial cosmetic formulations.
Main Methods:
- A direct contact membrane inoculation technique was employed.
- Test organisms (yeasts, molds, bacteria) were placed in direct contact with cosmetic samples.
- Linear regression analysis was used to determine D values (decimal reduction time) for microbial inactivation.
Main Results:
- In-house eye shadows showed D values of 1-3 days for Candida albicans and 17-29 days for Aspergillus niger.
- A commercial eye shadow had a D value of 6-7 days for yeast, but Aspergillus niger multiplied.
- The method differentiated preservative activity against fungi but not bacteria; products were most effective against bacteria and least against molds.
Conclusions:
- Germall 115 and Germall II demonstrate variable efficacy in pressed eye shadows.
- Preservative effectiveness is formulation-dependent and varies between microbial types.
- The direct contact membrane method is a sensitive tool for evaluating cosmetic preservative systems.

