Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Optimization of Synthetic Proteins: Identification of Interpositional Dependencies Indicating Structurally and/or Functionally Linked Residues
Published on: July 14, 2015
Identification of coevolving residues and coevolution potentials emphasizing structure, bond formation and catalytic
1Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
This study refines mutual information for protein coevolution analysis, improving accuracy by removing bias and accounting for variability. The enhanced method accurately predicts interacting residues, revealing insights into protein structure and function.
Area of Science:
- Computational Biology
- Protein Science
- Bioinformatics
Background:
- Protein structure and function rely on intricate residue interactions.
- Previous methods like mutual information detect coevolution but have limitations.
- Understanding coevolutionary pressures is key to predicting mutation effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop a refined mutual information method for detecting protein coevolution.
- To introduce 'coevolution potentials' as a novel measure for amino acid pairings.
- To validate the algorithm's accuracy by correlating predictions with known protein features.
Main Methods:
- Applied a refined mutual information algorithm to a large protein alignment database.
- Developed 'coevolution potentials' to quantify amino acid pair propensities.
- Correlated predicted coevolving pairs with physical proximity and functional roles (e.g., catalytic residues).
Main Results:
- The refined method effectively removes bias and accounts for heteroscedasticity in coevolutionary signals.
- Predicted coevolving residue pairs are significantly more likely to be in close physical proximity.
- Ionic, hydrogen, and disulfide bond-forming pairs show high coevolution potentials; catalytic residues are frequently identified as coevolving.
Conclusions:
- The improved algorithm accurately identifies functionally relevant coevolving residue pairs.
- Coevolutionary pressures shape protein mutational landscapes by favoring interactions.
- This work provides a more reliable tool for studying protein evolution and function.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
Noncovalent Attractions in Biomolecules
Four types of noncovalent interactions are hydrogen bonds, van der Waals forces, ionic bonds, and hydrophobic interactions.
Hydrogen bonding results from the electrostatic attraction of a hydrogen atom covalently bonded to a strong-electronegative atom like oxygen,...

