Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

10:32
Development of a Virtual Reality Assessment of Everyday Living Skills
Published on: April 23, 2014
Validity, reliability and predictive accuracy of the Driving Awareness Questionnaire
Lynnette G Kay1, Anita Bundy, Lindy Clemson
1Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia. l.kay@usyd.edu.au
Disability and Rehabilitation
|March 13, 2009
Summary
The Driving Awareness Questionnaire (DriveAware) shows good psychometric properties for assessing driving ability awareness. It accurately identifies awareness levels compared to on-road assessments, proving a useful clinical tool.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Psychometrics
- Rehabilitation Medicine
Background:
- Assessing awareness of driving ability is crucial for safe driving.
- Existing methods may lack comprehensive psychometric validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Driving Awareness Questionnaire (DriveAware).
- To compare DriveAware's awareness ratings with on-road driving assessments.
Main Methods:
- Prospective study design with Rasch analysis.
- 91 participants from driving rehabilitation centers completed DriveAware during a standard assessment.
- DriveAware awareness ratings were compared against on-road assessment outcomes.
Main Results:
- Rasch analysis supported construct validity and inter-rater reliability.
- DriveAware demonstrated good fit for most items and a moderate reliability index (0.73).
- The questionnaire achieved 84% sensitivity and 94% specificity when compared to on-road measures.
Conclusions:
- DriveAware is a psychometrically sound, easy-to-administer tool for measuring driving ability awareness.
- The questionnaire shows potential as a valuable clinical instrument for driving rehabilitation.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

