Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

X-ray Diffraction of Biological Samples01:10

X-ray Diffraction of Biological Samples

X-ray diffraction or XRD is an analytical tool that utilizes X-rays to study ordered structures such as crystalline organic and inorganic samples, polycrystalline materials, proteins, carbohydrates, and drugs.
According to Bragg's law, when X-rays strike the sample positioned on a stage, the rays are  scattered by the electron clouds around the sample atoms. The  X-ray diffraction or scattering is caused by constructive interference of the X-ray waves that reflect off the internal crystal...
Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation01:26

Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation

Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) is the common plasma source used in atomic emission spectroscopy (AES), a technique that detects and analyzes various elements in a sample. This method is often called inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES).
There are three main types of inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy  (ICP-AES) instruments: sequential, simultaneous multichannel, and Fourier transform instruments, with the latter being less commonly used.
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation01:22

Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Instrumentation

The instrumentation of atomic emission spectrometry (AES) involves various components, including atomization devices that convert samples into gas-phase atoms and ions. There are two main types of atomization devices: continuous and discrete atomizers.  Continuous atomizers, like plasmas and flames, introduce samples in a constant stream, while discrete atomizers inject individual samples using syringes or autosamplers. The most common discrete atomizer is the electrothermal atomizer.
NMR Spectrometers: Radiofrequency Pulses and Pulse Sequences01:17

NMR Spectrometers: Radiofrequency Pulses and Pulse Sequences

A pulse is a short burst of radio waves distributed over a range of frequencies that simultaneously excites all the nuclei in the sample. Upon passing a radio frequency pulse along the x-axis, the nuclei absorb energy corresponding to their Larmor frequencies and achieve resonance. This shifts the net magnetization vector from the z-axis toward the transverse plane. This angle of rotation of the magnetization vector, or the flip angle, is proportional to the duration and intensity of the pulse.
Determination of Crystal Structures01:29

Determination of Crystal Structures

In the late 1800s, the revelation that light extended beyond visible wavelengths led to the discovery of X-rays by Wilhelm Roentgen. Recognized as high-energy electromagnetic radiation with short wavelengths, X-rays prompted exploration into their interaction with crystals. Max von Laue proposed in 1912 that the periodic arrangement of atoms, ions, or molecules in crystals would cause them to diffract X-rays, a hypothesis confirmed through experiments with copper sulfate and zinc sulfide...
NMR Spectrometers: Overview01:20

NMR Spectrometers: Overview

NMR spectrometers consist of a strong magnet, a radiofrequency transmitter, and a detector attached to a computer console for recording spectra of samples containing NMR-active nuclei. In first-generation NMR instruments called continuous-wave spectrometers, the resonance frequencies of the nuclei are determined by frequency-sweep or field-sweep methods. The magnetic field strength is fixed and the rf signal is swept in the former, while the radiofrequency signal is fixed and the magnetic field...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vapor-Phase Heteroatom Incorporation into Semiconductive Molecular-Scale Magic-Size Clusters.

ACS nano·2026
Same author

Charges on a suspended silicon nitride membrane under a high-energy electron beam.

Nanoscale·2025
Same author

Fabrication of α-Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> Nanoparticles/g-C<sub>3</sub>N<sub>4</sub> Direct Z-Scheme Heterojunction of Durable Photocatalytic Activity.

ACS applied nano materials·2025
Same author

Structural Characterization of the Platinum Nanoparticle Hydrogen-Evolving Catalyst Assembled on Photosystem I by Light-Driven Chemistry.

ACS nano·2025
Same author

Vapor Infiltration Synthesis of Indium Sulfide Magic Size Cluster.

ACS nano·2024
Same author

Synthesis of Three Isoelemental MXenes and Their Structure-Property Relationships.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles
10:00

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles

Published on: July 5, 2016

Detector solid angle formulas for use in X-ray energy dispersive spectrometry.

Nestor J Zaluzec1

  • 1Argonne National Laboratory, Electron Microscopy Center, Materials Science Division Bldg. 212, 9700 S. Cass Ave., Argonne, IL 60439, USA. Zaluzec@aaem.amc.anl.gov

Microscopy and Microanalysis : the Official Journal of Microscopy Society of America, Microbeam Analysis Society, Microscopical Society of Canada
|March 17, 2009
PubMed
Summary

New formulas accurately calculate the detection solid angle for silicon drift detectors in electron optics. This overcomes limitations of traditional methods, enabling precise geometrical collection efficiency calculations.

More Related Videos

Hyperpolarized Xenon for NMR and MRI Applications
16:20

Hyperpolarized Xenon for NMR and MRI Applications

Published on: September 6, 2012

Elemental-sensitive Detection of the Chemistry in Batteries through Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering
07:55

Elemental-sensitive Detection of the Chemistry in Batteries through Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering

Published on: April 17, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles
10:00

Energy Dispersive X-ray Tomography for 3D Elemental Mapping of Individual Nanoparticles

Published on: July 5, 2016

Hyperpolarized Xenon for NMR and MRI Applications
16:20

Hyperpolarized Xenon for NMR and MRI Applications

Published on: September 6, 2012

Elemental-sensitive Detection of the Chemistry in Batteries through Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering
07:55

Elemental-sensitive Detection of the Chemistry in Batteries through Soft X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering

Published on: April 17, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Physics
  • Materials Science
  • Analytical Chemistry

Background:

  • Silicon drift detectors (SDDs) offer new possibilities in electron optical columns due to their compact size.
  • Traditional solid angle calculations for detectors are inadequate for novel geometries, leading to inaccuracies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop generalized formulas for calculating detection solid angle.
  • To address the limitations of traditional approximations in electron optics.
  • To enable accurate solid angle calculations for contemporary and new silicon drift detector configurations.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of generalized formulas for solid angle calculation.
  • Application of formulas to various silicon drift detector geometries.
  • Comparison with traditional approximation methods.

Main Results:

  • The generalized formulas provide accurate solid angle values for complex detector geometries.
  • Nonphysical results from traditional methods are resolved.
  • High geometrical collection efficiencies can be reliably determined.

Conclusions:

  • The presented formulas are essential for accurate solid angle calculations with modern X-ray detectors.
  • This work facilitates the optimization of detector design and performance in electron optical systems.
  • Precise solid angle determination is crucial for quantitative analysis in electron microscopy.