Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mate Choice01:20

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
Natural Selection and Mating Preferences01:06

Natural Selection and Mating Preferences

The principle of natural selection posits that organisms better adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. This principle is closely intertwined with mating preferences, a key aspect of sexual selection, which evolutionary psychologists believe is driven by instincts to propagate one's genes. Such instincts significantly influence mating behaviors and preferences between genders.
Females, due to their biological roles in conception, pregnancy, and nursing, inherently...
Hybrid Zones02:29

Hybrid Zones

Hybrid zones are narrow regions where two closely related species interact, mate, and produce hybrids. Relative to either parent species, hybrids may possess distinct phenotypic or genetic differences that impact their survival and reproductive success. The genetic variances introduced by hybridization influence species diversity and speciation processes within the hybrid zone.Gene flow and natural selection are evolutionary mechanisms that shape the outcome of a hybrid zone. Gene flow...
The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes02:45

The Ratio of X Chromosome to Autosomes

In most organisms, sex is determined by the ratio of X and Y chromosomes. However, in some organisms, such as Drosophila and C.elegans, sex is determined by the ratio of the number of X chromosomes to the number of sets of autosomes. The Y chromosome in Drosophila is active but does not determine sex. It contains genes responsible for the production of sperms in adult flies.  
Normal male Drosophila has a ratio of one X chromosome to two sets of autosomes. In contrast, normal female Drosophila...
Dosage Compensation02:50

Dosage Compensation

In animals, gender is determined by the number and type of sex chromosome. For example, human females have two X chromosomes, and males have one X and one Y chromosome, whereas C.elegans with one X chromosome is a male, and the one with two X chromosomes is a hermaphrodite.
In addition to sexual development, the X chromosome has genes involved in autosomal functions such as brain development and the immune system. Therefore, males and females with  distinct numbers of X chromosomes will have...
Background and Environment Affect Phenotype02:27

Background and Environment Affect Phenotype

Although the genetic makeup of an organism plays a major role in determining the phenotype, there are also several environmental factors, such as temperature, oxygen availability, presence of mutagens, that can alter an organism’s phenotype.
An example of how genetic background affects phenotype can be seen in horses. The Extension gene in horses is responsible for their coat color. A wild-type gene (EE) produces black pigment in the coat, while a mutant gene (ee) produces red pigment. A...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex allocation of hermaphrodites in metapopulations with frequent population extinction and recolonization.

Evolution; international journal of organic evolution·2026
Same author

Evolution of sex chromosomes in seed plants.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

On the Limits of Alpine Plants: A Systematic Review of the Factors Behind Species' Elevational Range Limits.

Ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Same fitness, different costs for females and males: a commentary on 'Diverging sex ratios in dioecious Proteaceae are exacerbated by anthropogenic disruptions to the fire cycle'.

Annals of botany·2026
Same author

An angiosperm-wide perspective on reproductive strategies and floral traits.

The New phytologist·2026
Same author

Sex-allocation trade-offs and their genetic architecture revealed by experimental evolution.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive cortical neurons implement optimal state estimation.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Coumarins link iron deficiency to TOR inhibition in plants.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Space-based monitoring of penguin diet links sea ice, food webs, and population change.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

A global response contributes to tissue size robustness upon local induction of apoptosis.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

Prebilaterian origin of monoaminergic signaling.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same journal

CLASP-dependent microtubule stabilization generates microtubule-based protrusive forces during Drosophila epithelial morphogenesis.

Current biology : CB·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
05:39

Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: December 2, 2022

Hermaphroditic sex allocation evolves when mating opportunities change.

Marcel E Dorken1, John R Pannell

  • 1Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK. marceldorken@trentu.ca

Current Biology : CB
|March 17, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Hermaphrodites adjusted their reproductive investment based on mating opportunities. When isolated from males, these plants evolved increased male allocation, demonstrating evolutionary adaptation in sex allocation strategies.

More Related Videos

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi
06:44

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

Volatile Sex Pheromone Extraction and Chemoattraction Assay in Caenorhabditis elegans
06:49

Volatile Sex Pheromone Extraction and Chemoattraction Assay in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: August 9, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
05:39

Determination of the Mating Efficiency of Haploids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Published on: December 2, 2022

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi
06:44

Induction and Evaluation of Inbreeding Crosses Using the Ant, Vollenhovia Emeryi

Published on: October 5, 2018

Volatile Sex Pheromone Extraction and Chemoattraction Assay in Caenorhabditis elegans
06:49

Volatile Sex Pheromone Extraction and Chemoattraction Assay in Caenorhabditis elegans

Published on: August 9, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Reproductive Strategies
  • Sex Allocation Theory

Background:

  • Hermaphroditic organisms must balance resource allocation between male and female functions.
  • Mating opportunities with unisexuals (males or females) are predicted to influence this sex allocation.
  • Previous models suggest selection favors male-biased allocation when hermaphrodites encounter females, and female-biased when encountering males.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To experimentally test the evolutionary response of hermaphroditic sex allocation to the presence or absence of males.
  • To investigate if Mercurialis annua hermaphrodites adapt their reproductive resource deployment based on mating environment.

Main Methods:

  • Evolved populations of Mercurialis annua hermaphrodites in controlled environments with and without males.
  • Assessed changes in sex allocation (male vs. female reproductive investment) over evolutionary time.
  • Compared evolutionary trajectories in the presence versus absence of unisexual males.

Main Results:

  • Hermaphrodites evolved greater male allocation when mating in the absence of males.
  • No significant evolution in sex allocation was observed when hermaphrodites were present with males, likely due to pre-existing female bias.
  • Results confirm predictions regarding evolutionary shifts in sex allocation driven by the frequency of unisexuals.

Conclusions:

  • This study provides the first empirical evidence of an evolutionary adaptation in hermaphroditic sex allocation in response to the frequency of unisexuals.
  • The findings support theoretical models predicting the transition from hermaphroditism towards dioecy (separate sexes) under specific ecological conditions.
  • Demonstrates the plasticity and adaptive potential of reproductive strategies in hermaphrodites.