Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

09:42
Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke
Published on: September 1, 2023
Minimal detectable change and clinically important difference of the Wolf Motor Function Test in stroke patients
Keh-chung Lin1, Yu-wei Hsieh, Ching-yi Wu
1School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
|March 18, 2009
Summary
Researchers established the minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CID) for the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) after stroke rehabilitation. The WMFT functional ability scale (FAS) appears more responsive than its performance time measure.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biostatistics
Background:
- Stroke significantly impairs motor function, necessitating reliable outcome measures for rehabilitation.
- The Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) is widely used, but its minimal detectable change (MDC) and clinically important differences (CID) require precise definition for stroke patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To establish the MDC and CID for the WMFT in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation.
- To determine the proportion of patients whose change scores exceed these thresholds.
Main Methods:
- 57 stroke patients received 3 weeks of treatment, with WMFT assessments pre- and post-intervention.
- MDC(90) was calculated using the standard error of measurement.
- Anchor-based and distribution-based methods were used to determine minimal CID.
Main Results:
- MDC(90) was 4.36 for WMFT performance time and 0.37 for WMFT functional ability scale (FAS).
- Minimal CID ranged from 1.5-2 seconds (WMFT time) and 0.2-0.4 points (WMFT FAS).
- Proportions exceeding MDC/CID were 14-30% (WMFT time) and 39-65% (WMFT FAS).
Conclusions:
- A change score of 4.36 (WMFT time) or 0.37 (WMFT FAS) indicates a real change for individual stroke patients.
- Clinically important changes are 1.5-2 seconds (WMFT time) and 0.2-0.4 points (WMFT FAS).
- WMFT FAS demonstrates greater responsiveness compared to WMFT time in this stroke cohort.

