Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A realist synthesis of integrated palliative care and oncology: Synopsis.

Health and social care delivery research·2026
Same author

A nurse-led foot care educational intervention for adults with end-stage kidney disease on haemodialysis: A pilot quantitative study.

Journal of tissue viability·2026
Same author

Mixed methods realist evaluation of a co-designed intervention to promote shared decision-making with frail older adults, planning discharge from hospital: a protocol.

BMC geriatrics·2025
Same author

Integrated palliative care and oncology: a realist synthesis.

BMC medicine·2025
Same author

Establishing palliative care research partnerships in Northern Ireland.

Health technology assessment (Winchester, England)·2025
Same author

What Helps or Hinders End-of-Life Care in Adult Intensive Care Units in Saudi Arabia? A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)·2024
Same journal

Using National Databases to Analyze Nurse Suicide Mortality.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators of Cervical Cancer Screening in Appalachia.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Study Protocol to Characterize Symptom Experience During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Cutaneous Melanoma.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Moderating Effects of Dementia on Health Outcomes in Dyads of Older Adults and Family Caregivers.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Scoping Review of Adolescent Autonomy and Responsibility for Managing Chronic Physical Conditions.

Nursing research·2026
Same journal

Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of Perioperative Thirst Management Interventions.

Nursing research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.

Janice Christie1, Peter O'Halloran, Mike Stevenson

  • 1School of Nursing and Midwifery, Queen's University Belfast, 97 Lisburn Road, Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom. j.christie@qub.ac.uk

Nursing Research
|March 18, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Cluster randomized controlled trials (CRCTs) are effective for health interventions targeting groups. This study addresses key design, sample size, and analysis issues for successful CRCT implementation in nursing research.

More Related Videos

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers
08:33

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
04:53

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

Published on: September 20, 2019

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers
08:33

A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial of Cranial Electrical Stimulation for Fibromyalgia Pain and Physical Function, Using Brain Imaging Biomarkers

Published on: January 5, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Nursing Research
  • Clinical Trials Methodology

Background:

  • Individual randomization is standard in clinical trials, but many health interventions are implemented at group levels (e.g., healthcare units, geographical areas).
  • Cluster randomization is often more appropriate for such interventions, but presents unique methodological challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate how critical design and analysis issues in cluster randomized controlled trials (CRCTs) can be effectively managed.
  • To provide guidance for researchers conducting CRCTs, particularly in nursing.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized two case studies of cluster randomized trials conducted by the authors.
  • Offered practical guidance on the conduct and reporting of cluster randomized trials.
  • Developed a decision tree and checklist to assist researchers.

Main Results:

  • Clarified issues related to study design, sample size calculation, and statistical analysis specific to CRCTs.
  • Provided a rationale for selecting the cluster randomization design.
  • A decision tree and checklist were created to guide researchers through essential steps.

Conclusions:

  • Cluster randomized controlled trials present distinct challenges in design, conduct, and analysis.
  • CRCTs are a valuable and powerful research tool for nursing.
  • Careful attention to methodological issues enables successful implementation of CRCTs.