Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Ultrasonography of the Adult Male Urinary Tract for Urinary Functional Testing
Published on: August 14, 2019
[New developments in the diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia]
M Vaida1, B Novac, V Gheorghiu
1Spitalul Clinic Militar de Urgenţă "Dr. Iacob Czihac", Clinica Chirurgie.
This review discusses the best ways to diagnose benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with lower urinary tract symptoms. The authors suggest starting with a detailed medical history, symptom scoring, and physical exams. Digital rectal examination is highlighted as a key step. If uncertainty remains, imaging or urodynamic tests may be needed. The review emphasizes a stepwise diagnostic approach to ensure accurate diagnosis and avoid unnecessary procedures. Prostate-specific antigen levels are noted as a potential indicator of prostate cancer risk. The authors propose a structured sequence of investigations to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Urology
- Diagnostic imaging
- Prostate disease
Background:
Lower urinary tract symptoms are common in aging populations. These symptoms may stem from various causes, including benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prior research has shown that accurate diagnosis is essential to avoid mismanagement. However, diagnostic approaches may vary between clinical settings. No prior work had resolved the best sequence for diagnostic steps in uncertain cases. This gap motivated the need for a structured diagnostic pathway. Existing knowledge includes symptom scoring systems and physical examination techniques. Yet, uncertainty remains about when to proceed with advanced imaging or urodynamic testing. This paper addresses how to integrate these diagnostic tools effectively.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this review is to clarify the diagnostic process for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The specific problem is the lack of consensus on diagnostic sequencing. The motivation comes from the need to reduce unnecessary procedures and improve patient outcomes. The authors propose a stepwise diagnostic approach. This includes initial screening followed by targeted investigations. The goal is to ensure accurate diagnosis while minimizing patient discomfort. The review focuses on evidence-based practices for urology. It emphasizes the role of symptom scoring and physical exams in early diagnosis.
Main Methods:
The authors conducted a literature review to synthesize current diagnostic practices. They analyzed published guidelines and clinical studies. The review approach included evaluating the role of symptom scoring systems. Physical examination techniques were also assessed for diagnostic value. The study considered the use of prostate-specific antigen in diagnosis. Imagistic and urodynamic methods were reviewed for uncertain cases. The synthesis focused on the diagnostic workflow for lower urinary tract symptoms. The authors compared diagnostic accuracy across different methods.
Main Results:
The initial diagnostic phase includes symptom scoring and physical exams. Digital rectal examination is highlighted as a key diagnostic tool. Urinalysis and renal function tests are essential for ruling out other conditions. Prostate-specific antigen levels may indicate prostate cancer risk. When initial findings are inconclusive, imaging is recommended. Urodynamic tests help assess bladder function in complex cases. Cystoscopy is reserved for cases with persistent uncertainty. The review suggests a structured sequence of investigations to improve accuracy.
Conclusions:
The authors propose a stepwise diagnostic approach for benign prostatic hyperplasia. They emphasize the importance of initial screening before advanced tests. Digital rectal examination remains central to the diagnostic process. Prostate-specific antigen should be interpreted with caution. When uncertainty persists, imaging and urodynamic tests are advised. The review suggests that diagnostic accuracy improves with structured methods. No prior work had resolved the optimal sequence of diagnostic steps. The authors highlight the need for consistent diagnostic protocols.
Frequently Asked Questions
The first step is to exclude other diseases using anamnesis, symptom scoring, and physical exams.
It quantifies symptoms and helps assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms.
It helps assess prostate size and texture, which may suggest benign prostatic hyperplasia.
Imaging is recommended when initial findings are inconclusive or diagnostic uncertainty remains.
It may suggest prostate cancer risk or predict prostate volume and disease progression.
They propose a structured diagnostic sequence to improve accuracy and reduce unnecessary tests.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra. Symptoms...
Urodynamic Studies: Uroflowmetry
