Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Contaminants and Errors

Contaminants and Errors

Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5% chance...

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The key role of local and global farmer networks in the development of conservation agriculture in California.

Journal of environmental quality·2025

Same author

Cost of hospitalisation for hip fracture-findings from the Irish hip fracture database.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2022

Same author

Characteristics of Centenarians in the Irish Hip Fracture Database.

Irish medical journal·2021

Same author

Discharge destination after hip fracture: findings from the Irish hip fracture database.

European geriatric medicine·2021

Same author

Trends in hip fracture care in the Republic of Ireland from 2013 to 2018: results from the Irish Hip Fracture Database.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2020

Same author

Leadership in Medicine: who will answer the call of duty?

Irish medical journal·2016

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)

Published on: July 11, 2014

Nematode damage functions: the problems of experimental and sampling error.

Journal of Nematology

|March 20, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method to improve pest damage predictions by accounting for errors and probabilities. It helps in better risk analysis for yield loss and management decisions.

Keywords:

confidence intervals crop loss economic thresholds management decisions risk analysis

More Related Videos

A Highly Scalable Approach to Perform Ecological Surveys of Selfing Caenorhabditis Nematodes

A Highly Scalable Approach to Perform Ecological Surveys of Selfing Caenorhabditis Nematodes

Published on: March 1, 2022

Application of RNA Interference in the Pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus

Application of RNA Interference in the Pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus

Published on: March 9, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)

Soil Sampling and Isolation of Entomopathogenic Nematodes (Steinernematidae, Heterorhabditidae)

Published on: July 11, 2014

A Highly Scalable Approach to Perform Ecological Surveys of Selfing Caenorhabditis Nematodes

A Highly Scalable Approach to Perform Ecological Surveys of Selfing Caenorhabditis Nematodes

Published on: March 1, 2022

Application of RNA Interference in the Pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus

Application of RNA Interference in the Pinewood Nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus

Published on: March 9, 2022

Area of Science:

Agricultural Science
Ecology
Statistical Modeling

Background:

Pest damage functions are crucial for predicting yield loss but are affected by various errors.
Incorporating probability alongside damage predictions enhances their practical value.
Accurate pest population estimates are essential for reliable damage assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a methodology for reducing experimental and sampling errors in pest damage function development.
To integrate probabilistic assessments into pest damage predictions for improved risk analysis.
To provide a framework for informed management decisions based on yield loss predictions.

Main Methods:

Collapsing pest population densities into discrete classes to mitigate pseudo-replication.
Analyzing the nature of sampling error for aggregated pest populations.
Calculating the product of probabilities from damage functions and population estimates.

Main Results:

A method is presented to reduce errors in damage function development through population class categorization.
The approach allows for the assessment of probability associated with pest population estimates.
The combined probabilities form a basis for robust risk analysis of predicted yield loss.

Conclusions:

The proposed methodology enhances the reliability of pest damage functions by addressing measurement and experimental errors.
Integrating probabilistic elements improves the accuracy of yield loss predictions.
This approach supports more informed and effective pest management strategies.