Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

11:39
Assessment of Audio-Tactile Sensory Substitution Training in Participants with Profound Deafness Using the Event-Related Potential Technique
Published on: September 7, 2022
Assessing binaural/bimodal advantages using auditory event-related potentials in subjects with cochlear implants
Tomo Sasaki1, Koichi Yamamoto, Takako Iwaki
1Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Sensory Organ Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan. tsasaki@ent.med.osaka-u.ac.jp
Auris, Nasus, Larynx
|March 20, 2009
Summary
Binaural and bimodal cochlear implant (CI) use significantly improves speech perception and auditory processing compared to monaural hearing. Event-related potentials confirm these benefits, supporting bilateral device use for CI patients.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Neuroscience
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Cochlear implants (CI) aim to restore hearing but optimal configurations for speech perception remain under investigation.
- Binaural (two CIs) and bimodal (CI plus contralateral hearing aid) hearing strategies are increasingly used.
- Objective measures like auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) can complement subjective speech perception tests.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the benefits of binaural and bimodal hearing in cochlear implant users.
- To compare speech perception and auditory processing using event-related potentials (ERPs) across different hearing conditions.
Main Methods:
- Compared speech perception in quiet using monosyllabic words for binaural CI users (CI/CI) and bimodal CI/hearing aid (HA) users.
- Measured late cortical ERPs (N1, N2, P3 latencies) during an auditory oddball task.
- Assessed monaural, binaural, and bimodal hearing conditions in subjects with over 6 months of device use.
Main Results:
- Both binaural and bimodal hearing significantly improved speech perception over monaural hearing (p<0.01).
- N2 and P3 latencies were significantly shorter in binaural and bimodal conditions compared to monaural (p<0.01).
- N1 latency showed no significant change, while P3 latency correlated with speech perception improvements.
Conclusions:
- Binaural and bimodal hearing configurations enhance speech perception in cochlear implant users compared to monaural fitting.
- Auditory event-related potentials, particularly P3 latency, serve as a reliable objective measure of these auditory benefits.
- The study recommends bilateral hearing device use for cochlear implant recipients to maximize auditory function.
