Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
Cheating the lie detector: faking in the autobiographical Implicit Association Test
Bruno Verschuere1, Valentina Prati, Jan De Houwer
1Department of Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium. bruno.verschuere@ugent.be
The autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT) shows promise for lie detection but can be faked. Guilty participants in studies successfully manipulated aIAT results, indicating it shares shortcomings with other deception detection methods.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Forensic Psychology
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- The autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT) was proposed as a novel lie-detection tool with high accuracy.
- Previous research suggested the aIAT is resistant to deceptive manipulation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the susceptibility of the aIAT to strategic faking.
- To determine if individuals can intentionally alter their aIAT performance.
Main Methods:
- Three experiments were conducted involving participants in a mock theft scenario.
- Participants' ability to manipulate aIAT outcomes was assessed under varying conditions, including response deadlines and lack of prior experience.
Main Results:
- Guilty participants were able to achieve an "innocent" outcome on the aIAT.
- The aIAT could be faked by guilty individuals even without prior exposure to the test or under time pressure.
Conclusions:
- The autobiographical Implicit Association Test (aIAT) is not resistant to faking.
- The aIAT shares vulnerabilities with other lie-detection methods, questioning its reliability as a deception detection tool.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
False Memories
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

