Related Experiment Videos
Risk factors associated with major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting
F Nahab1, M J Lynn, S E Kasner
1Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. fnahab@emory.edu
Insights
Intracranial stenting outcomes are linked to posterior circulation stenosis, low-volume centers, and early intervention post-event. These factors are crucial for monitoring in future stenting trials.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Neuroradiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Limited data exists on factors influencing clinical outcomes following intracranial stenting.
- Understanding patient and site characteristics is crucial for improving procedural safety and efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify patient and site characteristics associated with adverse clinical outcomes after intracranial stenting.
- To inform future research and clinical practice for intracranial stenting procedures.
Main Methods:
- A multivariable analysis was conducted on 160 patients undergoing intracranial stenting for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis.
- The primary endpoint included stroke or death within 30 days, or stroke in the stented artery territory beyond 30 days.
- Patient demographics, lesion location, time to intervention, and procedural site volume were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Posterior circulation stenosis (HR 3.4) and stenting at low-volume sites (HR 2.8) were significantly associated with adverse outcomes.
- Intervention within 10 days of the qualifying event (HR 2.7) and stroke as the qualifying event (HR 3.2) also showed a trend towards increased risk.
- No significant differences were observed based on age, gender, race, or degree of stenosis (50-69% vs 70-99%).
Conclusions:
- Posterior circulation stenosis, low-volume procedural sites, early intervention, and stroke as the qualifying event are potential risk factors for cerebrovascular complications.
- These identified factors warrant close monitoring in ongoing and future clinical trials evaluating intracranial stenting.
Background:
There are limited data on the relationship between patient and site characteristics and clinical outcomes after intracranial stenting.
Methods:
We performed a multivariable analysis that correlated patient and site characteristics with the occurrence of the primary endpoint (any stroke or death within 30 days of stenting or stroke in the territory of the stented artery beyond 30 days) in 160 patients enrolled in this stenting registry. All patients presented with an ischemic stroke, TIA, or other cerebral ischemic event (e.g., vertebrobasilar insufficiency) in the territory of a suspected 50-99% stenosis of a major intracranial artery while on antithrombotic therapy.
Results:
Cerebral angiography confirmed that 99% (158/160) of patients had a 50-99% stenosis. In multivariable analysis, the primary endpoint was associated with posterior circulation stenosis (vs anterior circulation) (hazard ratio [HR] 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-9.3, p = 0.018), stenting at low enrollment sites (< 10 patients each) (vs high enrollment site) (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.1-7.6, p = 0.038), < or = 10 days from qualifying event to stenting (vs > or = 10 days) (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.0-7.8, p = 0.058), and stroke as a qualifying event (vs TIA/other) (HR 3.2, 95% CI 0.9-11.2, p = 0.064). There was no significant difference in the primary endpoint based on age, gender, race, or percent stenosis (50-69% vs 70-99%).
Conclusions:
Major cerebrovascular complications after intracranial stenting may be associated with posterior circulation stenosis, low volume sites, stenting soon after a qualifying event, and stroke as the qualifying event. These factors will need to be monitored in future trials of intracranial stenting.
Related Concept Videos
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction
Hemorrhagic Stroke l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction
Cerebral Edema ll: Pathophysiology