Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:

Decision Making: Traditional Method

Decision Making: Traditional Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...

Decision Making: P-value Method

Decision Making: P-value Method

The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...

Ethics in Research

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care evaluation by...

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions

PK–PD modeling has significantly influenced FDA regulatory decisions, particularly drug approval, dosage optimization, and labeling. These models integrate pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to predict drug behavior and effects, aiding in optimizing dosing regimens and enhancing the probability of clinical trial success.One notable example is Nesiritide (Natrecor®), a recombinant human brain natriuretic peptide for treating acute decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF).

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Developing a tool for supporting health-system guidance implementation paper 2: a developmental and formative evaluation study.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Developing a tool for supporting health-system guidance implementation paper 1: a modified Delphi method to develop the tool components.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2026

Same author

Creating an integrated innovation system to enable the adaptation and uptake of health-system innovations in Canada: insights from citizen panels and a national stakeholder dialogue.

Health research policy and systems·2025

Same author

Process Evaluation of a Rapid Evidence Support System Assessment of Ireland's Department of Health - A Protocol.

HRB open research·2025

Same author

Jurisdictional scans: methodological considerations for systematically analyzing and comparing policy approaches across different jurisdictions.

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2025

Same author

Call to action: building a better future together, powered by evidence, guided by collective impact.

The Cochrane database of systematic reviews·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

Moving forward on both systematic reviews and deliberative processes.

¹Member, Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, Associate Professor, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Associate Member, Department of Political Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.

Healthcare Policy = Politiques De Sante

|March 24, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Systematic reviews offer valuable knowledge support for decision-makers. Improving access and presentation of these reviews, alongside transparent evidence synthesis, is key for effective policy and management.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

Area of Science:

Health policy research
Evidence synthesis methodologies

Background:

Systematic reviews are recognized as crucial knowledge support tools for policymakers.
Deliberative processes are emerging as valuable decision support mechanisms within specific contexts.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore strategies for enhancing the utility of systematic reviews and deliberative processes.
To address challenges in accessing and utilizing synthesized research evidence for decision-making.

Main Methods:

Analysis of current practices in knowledge translation and evidence utilization.
Review of methods for facilitating retrieval and adapting presentation of systematic reviews.
Examination of transparent evidence combination for cross-context learning.

Main Results:

Increased flow of systematic reviews necessitates improved retrieval and adaptive presentation.
Transparent synthesis of research and evidence is vital for cross-context learning.
Potential confusion arises from the distinct branding of systematic reviews and deliberative processes.

Conclusions:

Effective knowledge support requires optimizing access to systematic reviews.
Decision support can be enhanced by transparently combining diverse evidence.
Clear communication is needed to avoid confusion between different evidence-informed approaches.