Ethical reasoning about patient eligibility in allogeneic BMT based on psychosocial criteria

Chairpersons of the hospital ethics committees (HECs) and BMT clinicians were compared with regard to their willingness to proceed with allogeneic BMT given select psychosocial risk factors. A self-administered questionnaire was sent to 62 HEC chairpersons at hospitals with an accredited BMT program; the response rate was 37%. Items included background information, followed by six case vignettes from a 2006 national survey on which BMT physicians, nurses and social workers agreed not to proceed with allogeneic BMT on the basis of the following risk factors: suicidal ideation; use of addictive, illicit drugs; history of non-compliance; absence of a caregiver; alcoholism; and mild dementia from early onset of Alzheimer's disease. Opinions regarding transplant differed in one case only, in a patient with mild dementia; 27% of HEC chairpersons recommended not proceeding with BMT, which was significantly lower than that of nurses (68%, P<0.001), physicians (63.5%, P<0.001) and social workers (51.9%, P=0.05). Qualitative data show patterns of informal reasoning, linking transplant decisions to patient's responsibility for their psychosocial risk factor(s), as well as to medical benefit and outcome.