Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Birth weight effects on children's mental, motor, and physical development: evidence from twins data
Ashlesha Datar1, Alison Jacknowitz
1RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, Santa Monica, CA 90407, USA. datar@rand.org
Insights
Very low birth weight (VLBW) and moderately low birth weight (MLBW) significantly impact early childhood growth. However, after accounting for maternal, environmental, and genetic factors, low birth weight has minimal effects on mental and motor development by age two.
Area of Science:
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Perinatal Medicine
- Child Psychology
Background:
- Low birth weight, including very low birth weight (VLBW) and moderately low birth weight (MLBW), is a significant concern for child development.
- Understanding the long-term effects of birth weight on cognitive, motor, and physical development is crucial for early intervention strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the impact of VLBW and MLBW on children's mental, motor, and physical development up to two years of age.
- To determine if children with VLBW and MLBW achieve developmental catch-up compared to normal birth weight (NBW) children by age two.
Main Methods:
- Utilized data from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (ECLS-B) on twins (dizygotic and monozygotic) and singletons.
- Employed within-twin analyses to control for shared genetic and environmental factors, alongside multivariate regression models.
- Assessed effects on mental and motor development scores and various growth z-scores at 9 months and 2 years.
Main Results:
- Initial analysis indicated negative effects of VLBW and MLBW on development and growth.
- Within-twin analyses revealed minimal impact of birth weight on mental and motor development when controlling for shared factors.
- Significant negative effects of low birth weight on physical growth persisted, with no evidence of catch-up by age two.
Conclusions:
- After controlling for maternal, environmental, and genetic influences, low birth weight has a minor effect on early childhood mental and motor development.
- Low birth weight remains a substantial risk factor for impaired physical growth in the initial years of life.
- Children born with low birth weight do not demonstrate developmental catch-up in physical growth by the age of two.
Objective:
To determine the effect of very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g) and moderately low birth weight (MLBW; 1500-2499 g) on children's mental and motor development and physical growth during the first 2 years of life and whether VLBW and MLBW babies catch up to normal birth weight (NBW; > or =2500 g) children by age 2.
Methods:
We use data on dizygotic (DZ) and monozygotic (MZ) twins and singleton births from the first two waves of the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study-Birth Cohort (ECLS-B), a nationally representative dataset of children born in the US in 2001. We estimate the effects of VLBW and MLBW on children's mental and motor development scores, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-for-height, and length-for-age z-scores at 9 months and 2 years. We examine whether differences in outcomes within twin pairs are related to differences in their birth weights. The within-twins analysis is conducted on samples of DZ and MZ twins. For comparison, we also estimate birth weight effects on child outcomes from multivariate linear regression models using the full singleton and twins' sample. We also estimate the effect of being small-for-gestational age (SGA; birth weight <10th percentile for gestation) using the same set of models in order to separate out the effects of fetal growth restriction from prematurity.
Results:
Evaluation of all births showed that VLBW and MLBW have large negative effects on mental development, motor development, and growth at 9 months and 2 years of age. However, results from within-twin models with DZ twins that control for shared maternal and environmental factors showed much less effect of birth weight on mental or motor development, but continued large effects on growth for the VLBW group. Within-twin models with MZ twins that control for shared maternal, environmental, and genetic factors showed statistically insignificant effects of birth weight on mental and motor development, but continued effects on growth. Similar patterns were found when examining the effects of SGA.
Conclusions:
After controlling for the influence of maternal, environmental, and genetic factors, low birth weight has at most a small negative effect on children's mental and motor development in their first 2 years of life. However, low birth weight is a major risk factor for children's physical growth in the early years and there is no evidence of catch-up by age 2.
Related Concept Videos
Biological Influences on Intelligence
Environmental Influences on Intelligence
Behavioral Genetics and Its Designs
The primary methodologies used in behavior genetics include family studies, twin studies, and adoption studies, each providing unique...
Regression Toward the Mean
Nature and Nurture
Heritability
