Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The relationship between buccofacial and limb apraxia.

A S Raade1, L J Rothi, K M Heilman

  • 1Department of Communicative Disorders, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

Brain and Cognition
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

This study investigated buccofacial and limb apraxia, finding significant differences between them. The results support a nonunitary model, suggesting distinct mechanisms for these motor disorders.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vertical pseudoneglect: Sensory-attentional versus action-intentional.

Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology·2022
Same author

Unilateral Apraxic Agraphia without Ideomotor Apraxia from a callosal lesion in a patient with Marchiafava-Bignami disease.

Neurocase·2018
Same author

The visual kinetic depth effect is altered with Parkinson's disease.

Parkinsonism & related disorders·2017
Same author

A full-brain, bootstrapped analysis of diffusion tensor imaging robustly differentiates Parkinson disease from healthy controls.

Neuroinformatics·2014
Same author

The role of cognitive models in language rehabilitation.

NeuroRehabilitation·2014
Same author

Praxis performance with left versus right hemisphere lesions.

NeuroRehabilitation·2014

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Motor Control

Background:

  • Apraxia is a motor disorder affecting voluntary movements.
  • Two models exist: unitary (transcending modalities) and nonunitary (modality-specific).
  • Understanding the relationship between buccofacial and limb apraxia is crucial for diagnosis and treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between buccofacial apraxia and limb apraxia.
  • To determine if a unitary or nonunitary model best explains their connection.
  • To analyze quantitative and qualitative differences in performance between these apraxias.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of buccofacial and limb apraxia performance.
  • Assessment of similarity and differences across output modalities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilizing quantitative and qualitative performance metrics.

    • Main Results:

    • Significant quantitative and qualitative differences were observed between buccofacial and limb apraxia.
    • The findings did not support a unitary model of apraxia.
    • Evidence strongly favors a nonunitary model for these conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Buccofacial and limb apraxia appear to be distinct disorders.
    • The nonunitary model provides a better framework for understanding their relationship.
    • Future research should explore modality-specific neural underpinnings.