Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Novel and Innovative Hybrid Technique for Type A Aortic Dissection
Published on: March 28, 2025
Type B aortic dissections: treating the many to benefit the few?
Dittmar Böckler1, Alexander Hyhlik-Dürr, Maani Hakimi
1Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Germany. dittmar.boeckler@med.uniheidelberg.de
Insights
Endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections has considerable complication and mortality rates. Asymptomatic patients currently benefit more from conservative treatment than stent-grafting.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Thoracic Aortic Disease
Background:
- Type B aortic dissections can be treated with less invasive stent-grafts.
- Recent studies suggest conservative management for chronic dissections due to low complication rates.
- This study evaluates the shift towards endovascular repair for acute and non-complex type B dissections.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze institutional experience with endovascular repair for type B aortic dissections.
- To determine if stent-graft availability has led to a more aggressive endovascular approach.
- To identify optimal patient selection for endovascular versus conservative treatment.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 172 patients with type B aortic dissections (1997-2008).
- 118 patients received conservative treatment; 54 underwent endovascular repair.
- Follow-up included computed tomographic angiography.
Main Results:
- Successful stent-graft deployment in 93% of cases; 19% perioperative complications, 11% 30-day mortality.
- Mean follow-up of 32.1 months; overall mortality 18.5%.
- False lumen thrombosis in 60%, aortic expansion in 31%; no survival difference between acute and chronic dissections.
Conclusions:
- Endovascular therapy for type B aortic dissections carries significant complication and mortality risks.
- Stent-grafting is currently indicated for symptomatic patients or those with chronic aneurysmal expansion.
- Asymptomatic patients are best managed conservatively at this stage of stent-graft technology.
Purpose:
It is now more than a decade since aortic stent-grafts were introduced clinically to provide a less invasive and potentially less harmful therapeutic option to treat type B aortic dissections. However, recent publications on best medical treatment and quality of life in patients with chronic type B dissection support conservative treatment due to the low incidence of aneurysm formation, rupture, and disease-related complications. Against this backdrop, we analyzed our experiences and now discuss whether the availability of endografts allowed us to change indications toward a more aggressive endovascular approach to acute and non-complex type B dissections, seeking to determine which patients we should treat and which ones we should observe.
Methods:
Between 1997 and 2008 in our institution in Heidelberg, we treated 172 patients with acute and chronic type B dissections, most (n = 118, 69%) conservatively. However, 54 patients (40 men; mean age 57 years, range 30-82) underwent endovascular repair; 43% (n = 23) were emergency cases. Patients were followed periodically with computed tomographic angiography.
Results:
Correct stent-graft deployment was achieved in 50 (93%) patients; the left subclavian artery was intentionally covered in 30 (55%) cases. Two carotid-subclavian bypass grafts were performed at the time of the endovascular repair due to partial coverage of the left common carotid artery. The perioperative complication rate was 19% (n = 10), but there were no neurological sequelae. The 30-day mortality rate was 11% (n = 6). Over a mean 32.1+/-25 months, 4 other patients died (18.5% overall mortality rate); survival estimates by Kaplan-Meier analysis were 80.4% and 66.1% after 1 and 5 years, respectively. Complete false lumen thrombosis was observed in 32 (60%) and a persisting completely patent false lumen in 3. The aortic expansion rate was 31% (17/54) overall. No difference was found between acute and chronic dissections in terms of survival (p = 0.247).
Conclusion:
Despite a minimally invasive approach, complication and mortality rates for endovascular therapy of type B aortic dissections are considerable. Endografting is limited to symptomatic patients and those with chronic large aneurysmal expansion. At this stage in stent-graft development, asymptomatic patients benefit more from conservative treatment.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management