Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
The size of the treatment effect: do patients and proxies agree?
Femke A H van der Linden1, Jolijn J Kragt, Jeremy C Hobart
1Department of Neurology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. fah.vdlinden@vumc.nl
Background:
This study examined whether MS patients and proxy respondents agreed on change in disease impact, which was induced by treatment. This may be of interest in situations when patients suffer from limitations that interfere with reliable self-assessment, such as cognitive impairment.
Methods:
MS patients and proxies completed the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) before and after intravenous steroid treatment. Analyses focused on patient-proxy agreement between MSIS-29 change scores. Transition ratings were used to measure the patient's judgement of change and whether this change was reflected in the MSIS-29 change of patients and proxies. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were also performed to examine the diagnostic properties of the MSIS-29 when completed by patients and proxies.
Results:
42 patients and proxy respondents completed the MSIS-29 at baseline and follow-up. Patient-proxy differences between change scores on the physical and psychological MSIS-29 subscale were quite small, although large variability was found. The direction of mean change was in concordance with the transition ratings of the patients. Results of the ROC analyses of the MSIS-29 were similar when completed by patients (physical scale: AUC = 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65-0.93 and 0.66, 95% CI: 0.48-0.84 for the psychological scale) and proxies (physical scale: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.72-0.96 and 0.71, 95% CI: 0.56-0.87 for the psychological scale)
Conclusion:
Although the results need to be further explored in larger samples, these results do point towards possible use of proxy respondents to assess patient perceived treatment change at the group level.
Insights
Proxy respondents largely agree with Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) patient assessments of treatment change, suggesting their utility in group-level evaluations, especially when patient self-assessment is challenging.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Clinical Research
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Assessing treatment-induced changes in disease impact for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients can be challenging.
- Cognitive impairment or other limitations may affect reliable patient self-assessment.
- Proxy respondents may offer an alternative perspective on disease impact changes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the agreement between MS patients and their proxy respondents regarding changes in disease impact after treatment.
- To determine if proxy assessments using the MSIS-29 align with patient-reported changes.
- To explore the diagnostic utility of the MSIS-29 when completed by patients versus proxies.
Main Methods:
- Patients and proxies completed the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29) pre- and post-intravenous steroid treatment.
- Analysis focused on patient-proxy agreement in MSIS-29 change scores.
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed the diagnostic properties of the MSIS-29 for both patient and proxy completions.
Main Results:
- Patient-proxy differences in MSIS-29 change scores were small, with considerable variability noted.
- The direction of mean change reported by patients was consistent with proxy ratings.
- ROC analyses showed similar diagnostic performance for the MSIS-29 when completed by patients and proxies.
Conclusions:
- Proxy respondents demonstrate potential utility in assessing patient-perceived treatment changes at a group level.
- Findings suggest that proxy assessments can complement patient self-reports, particularly in cases of impaired self-assessment.
- Further validation in larger cohorts is recommended to solidify the role of proxy respondents.
Related Concept Videos
Regression Toward the Mean
Dosage Regimen: Individualization
Blind Procedures
The Placebo Effect
Blinding
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment