Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

06:42
Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
How do American undergraduates view suicide bombers?
1Psychology Program, Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, Jimmie Leeds Road, Pomona, NJ 08240-0195, USA. lesterd@stockton.edu
Psychological Reports
|March 27, 2009
Summary
American students viewed suicide bombers targeting civilians more negatively than those targeting soldiers. This perception highlights differing moral judgments in conflict scenarios involving non-combatants.
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Political Psychology
- Conflict Studies
Background:
- Understanding public perception of political violence is crucial.
- Distinguishing between targeting civilians and soldiers impacts moral judgments.
- Previous research has explored attitudes towards terrorism and political conflict.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate American undergraduates' moral perceptions of different types of political violence.
- To compare attitudes towards suicide bombers and guerilla fighters targeting civilians versus soldiers.
Main Methods:
- A survey was administered to 69 American undergraduates (mean age = 22.1 years).
- Participants rated their negative views of hypothetical scenarios involving suicide bombers and guerilla fighters.
- Scenarios differentiated between targets: civilians versus soldiers.
Main Results:
- Suicide bombers and guerilla fighters who killed civilians were viewed significantly more negatively.
- Participants showed less negative views towards perpetrators targeting soldiers.
Conclusions:
- American undergraduates differentiate moral judgments based on the target of political violence.
- The deliberate targeting of civilians elicits stronger negative moral condemnation than targeting soldiers.
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
Cognitive Dissonance
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Bystander Effect
The discussion of bullying highlights the problem of witnesses not intervening to help a victim. This is a common occurrence, as the following well-publicized event demonstrates. In 1964, in Queens, New York, a 19-year-old woman named Kitty Genovese was attacked by a person with a knife near the back entrance to her apartment building and again in the hallway inside her apartment building. When the attack occurred, she screamed for help numerous times and eventually died from her stab wounds.
The Stanford Prison Experiment
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”
