Should macroprolactin be measured in all hyperprolactinaemic sera?

T Joseph McKenna1

  • 1Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes Mellitus, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Dublin, Ireland. mckennatj@gmail.com

Clinical Endocrinology
|March 27, 2009
PubMed

Insights

Macroprolactin, a large prolactin variant, causes most cases of hyperprolactinaemia. Recognizing macroprolactinaemia prevents unnecessary tests and misdiagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Biochemistry
  • Endocrinology
  • Reproductive Medicine

Background:

  • Macroprolactin is a nonbioactive prolactin isoform comprising prolactin and IgG.
  • Macroprolactinaemia accounts for approximately 10% of clinical hyperprolactinaemia cases in the UK and US.
  • Failure to identify macroprolactinaemia leads to unnecessary investigations and inappropriate treatment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the clinical significance of macroprolactinaemia.
  • To advocate for routine screening of hyperprolactinaemic sera for macroprolactin.
  • To emphasize the cost-effectiveness and availability of screening methods.

Main Methods:

  • Polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation assay is the primary method.
  • PEG precipitates high-molecular-weight constituents, including macroprolactin.
  • Re-assaying prolactin levels after PEG treatment identifies macroprolactinaemia.

Main Results:

  • Macroprolactin is a common cause of elevated prolactin levels.
  • Screening readily identifies macroprolactinaemia in biochemistry laboratories.
  • The PEG precipitation method effectively distinguishes macroprolactin from bioactive prolactin.

Conclusions:

  • Routine screening for macroprolactin in hyperprolactinaemic patients is strongly recommended.
  • Early recognition of macroprolactinaemia improves diagnostic accuracy and patient management.
  • Available screening methods are effective, accessible, and cost-efficient.

Related Concept Videos