Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults
Published on: February 8, 2019
Work environments and staff responses to work environments in institutional long-term care
Ann Elizabeth Tourangeau1, Kimberley Widger, Lisa A Cranley
1Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. ann.tourangeau@utoronto.ca
Background:
Structures and processes of care such as work environments and care provider responses to work environments have been shown to influence organizational outcomes. To improve health care quality, structures, processes, and outcomes of care should be considered. There is almost no literature reporting on the structural characteristics of work environments and care provider responses to work environments in institutional long-term (chronic) care settings.
Purpose:
The purpose of this article was to report how a convenience sample of multidisciplinary care providers working in institutional long-term (chronic) care settings in Ontario, Canada, evaluated their work environments and their responses to these environments.
Methodology:
A sample of multidisciplinary care providers working within six institutional long-term care settings completed a survey rating their work environments (e.g., supervisor support and effectiveness and work empowerment) and responses to work environments (e.g., job satisfaction, burnout, and intention to remain employed). The survey included three well-established instruments: Supervisory Support Scale; Learn, Empower, Achieve, and Produce instrument; and the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey data. To determine whether there were differences in staff characteristics, ratings of work environments, and responses to work environments across the four participant job categories, tests of differences were completed using analyses of variance with Tukey post hoc (continuous variables) and chi-square (categorical variables) tests.
Findings:
Ratings of the work environment were similar across job categories and indicated opportunities for improvement. Overall job satisfaction was rated between "neutral" and "satisfied." On average, the staff reported moderate levels of emotional exhaustion (burnout). More than one third of all staff members reported planning to leave their employment, including two thirds of allied health professionals.
Practice Implications:
Strategies are suggested to strengthen institutional long-term care work environments to promote more positive staff responses to work environments, including higher job satisfaction and intention to remain employed.
Related Concept Videos
Restorative Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...
Continuing Care
Obedience
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-II
Rural health centers are specialized care facilities in remote locations with very few medical personnel. The primary care providers who run the centers are mostly Registered Nurse Practitioners. Here, emergency treatment is provided to critically ill or injured patients before they are transferred to the closest hospital. Fortunately, due to advancement in technology, many rural healthcare facilities and professionals have easy access to diagnostic and treatment...