Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

In Vitro Thrombosis Test for Ventricular Assist Devices
Published on: March 21, 2025
Using thrombophilia testing to determine anticoagulation duration in pediatric thrombosis is not cost-effective
Sarah H O'Brien1, Kenneth J Smith
1Center for Innovation in Pediatric Practice, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA. sarah.obrien@nationwidechildrens.org
Insights
For children experiencing a first blood clot, 3 months of anticoagulation without thrombophilia testing is the most cost-effective strategy. Universal thrombophilia testing is not cost-effective for determining treatment duration.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric thrombosis
- Health economics
- Clinical decision-making
Background:
- Thrombophilia testing in children with thrombosis is common but its cost-effectiveness is debated.
- Determining optimal anticoagulation duration is crucial for patient outcomes and resource allocation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different thrombophilia testing and anticoagulation strategies in pediatric patients with a first episode of thrombosis.
- To inform clinical guidelines regarding thrombophilia testing in this population.
Main Methods:
- A 2-year Markov model was developed to compare three strategies: no testing with 3-month anticoagulation, no testing with 6-month anticoagulation, and testing with treatment duration based on results.
- Clinical probabilities were estimated from literature searches, and quality-of-life and cost data were sourced from published data.
Main Results:
- The least expensive strategy was 3 months of anticoagulation without testing ($7900 per patient), which was also the most effective (1.74 quality-adjusted life-years).
- This strategy was more effective by 0.01 to 0.03 quality-adjusted life-years compared to other strategies.
- While cost-utility ratios were sensitive to hospitalization and medication costs, the 3-month no-testing approach remained the preferred choice.
Conclusions:
- Universal thrombophilia testing is not cost-effective when solely used to guide anticoagulation duration in children with a first thrombosis.
- A comprehensive thrombophilia panel should not be a routine response for every deep venous thrombosis diagnosis in pediatric patients.
Objective:
To address the cost-effectiveness of thrombophilia testing and treatment strategies among children with a first episode of thrombosis.
Study Design:
A 2-year Markov model was developed to evaluate the cost-utility of 3 strategies: (1) no testing, anticoagulate for 3 months, (2) no testing, anticoagulate for 6 months, and (3) testing, anticoagulate 3 or 6 months, based on results. We performed a literature search to estimate clinical probabilities and obtained quality-of-life and cost data from published sources.
Results:
Total costs per patient were $7900 for no test, treat for 3 months; $8900 for test, treat based on results; and $12,100 for no test, treat for 6 months. Three months of treatment without testing was the least expensive strategy and also the most effective (1.74 quality-adjusted life-years) by 0.01 to 0.03 quality-adjusted life-years. Cost-utility ratios were sensitive to variation in hospitalization and medication costs, but 3 months, no testing, always remained the preferred choice.
Conclusions:
Universal thrombophilia testing after a first episode of thrombosis is not cost-effective when used solely to determine anticoagulation duration. Therefore, a full panel of thrombophilia studies does not need to be an automatic response at the time of any deep venous thrombosis diagnoses.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Anticoagulant Drugs: Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants
Warfarin, a prominent vitamin K antagonist family member, exerts its effect by inhibiting the enzyme VKORC1 (vitamin K epoxide reductase complex 1). By hindering this enzyme, warfarin...
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
