Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...

Mate Choice

Mate Choice

Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.

Optimal Foraging

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

Fixed Action Patterns

Fixed Action Patterns

A fixed action pattern (FAP) is a specific, hard-wired sequence of behaviors that occurs in response to an external stimulus, called a sign stimulus. The behavior is “fixed” because it is essentially unchangeable—proceeding similarly across individuals of a species every time it occurs.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Biodiversity resilience in a tropical rainforest.

Nature·2026

Same author

The influence of illumination and cast shadows on prey detectability by predators.

Royal Society open science·2025

Same author

Predicting the amount of toxic metals and metalloids in silt loading using neural networks.

Environmental monitoring and assessment·2025

Same author

Habitat heterogeneity limits prey colour polymorphism maintained via negative frequency-dependent selection.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2024

Same author

Genetic structure, UV-vision, wing coloration and size coincide with colour polymorphism in Fabriciana adippe butterflies.

Molecular ecology·2024

Same author

Author Correction: Soundscapes and deep learning enable tracking biodiversity recovery in tropical forests.

Nature communications·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds.

Marina Dimitrova¹, Nina Stobbe, H Martin Schaefer

¹Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. marina.dimitrova@zoologi.su.se

Proceedings. Biological Sciences

|March 28, 2009

Summary

High-contrast markings on prey and backgrounds enhance camouflage by distracting predators. This distractive camouflage makes prey harder to detect, improving survival rates in various environments.

More Related Videos

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Published on: May 14, 2010

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Recording Behavioral Responses to Reflection in Crayfish

Published on: May 14, 2010

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Manipulation of Color Patterns in Jumping Spiders for Use in Behavioral Experiments

Published on: May 21, 2019

Area of Science:

Ecology
Animal Behavior
Evolutionary Biology

Background:

Distractive or dazzle markings on prey are hypothesized to hinder predator detection by capturing attention.
The effectiveness of these markings and their extrapolation to background patterns for prey concealment remain under investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

To test the hypothesis that high-contrast markings on artificial prey improve camouflage against avian predators.
To investigate if high-contrast backgrounds enhance prey concealment and if this effect is independent of prey-background matching.

Main Methods:

A predation experiment using blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and artificial prey with varying contrast levels (high-contrast prey [HC-P] vs. low-contrast prey [LC-P]).
Prey detection times were measured against high-contrast backgrounds (HC-B) and low-contrast backgrounds (LC-B).

Main Results:

High-contrast prey (HC-P) were significantly harder to detect in both background types compared to a generalist prey.
Both prey types were more difficult to detect against a high-contrast background (HC-B) than a low-contrast background (LC-B).
Prey concealment was enhanced by high-contrast markings, irrespective of precise background matching.

Conclusions:

Distractive prey patterns and background features effectively improve camouflage, increasing prey concealment.
High-contrast markings, whether on prey or in the environment, are crucial for enhancing predator avoidance.