Concealed by conspicuousness: distractive prey markings and backgrounds
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
Published on: August 29, 2018
Marina Dimitrova1, Nina Stobbe, H Martin Schaefer
1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden. marina.dimitrova@zoologi.su.se
Abstract:
High-contrast markings, called distractive or dazzle markings, have been suggested to draw and hold the attention of a viewer, thus hindering detection or recognition of revealing prey characteristics, such as the body outline. We tested this hypothesis in a predation experiment with blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) and artificial prey. We also tested whether this idea can be extrapolated to the background appearance and whether high-contrast markings in the background would improve prey concealment. We compared search times for a high-contrast range prey (HC-P) and a low-contrast range prey (LC-P) in a high-contrast range background (HC-B) and a low-contrast range background (LC-B). The HC-P was more difficult to detect in both backgrounds, although it did not match the LC-B. Also, both prey types were more difficult to find in the HC-B than in the LC-B, in spite of the mismatch of the LC-P. In addition, the HC-P was more difficult to detect, in both backgrounds, when compared with a generalist prey, not mismatching either background. Thus, we conclude that distractive prey pattern markings and selection of microhabitats with distractive features may provide an effective way to improve camouflage. Importantly, high-contrast markings, both as part of the prey coloration and in the background, can indeed increase prey concealment.
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Mate Choice
Optimal Foraging
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Types of Selection
Fixed Action Patterns

