Harris-Benedict equation for critically ill patients: are there differences with indirect calorimetry?
Camila C Japur1, Fernanda R O Penaforte, Paula G Chiarello
1Departamento de Clínica Médica, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil. camila@fmrp.usp.br
Purpose:
The aim of this study was to compare the measured energy expenditure (EE) and the estimated basal EE (BEE) in critically ill patients.
Materials And Methods:
Seventeen patients from an intensive care unit were randomly evaluated. Indirect calorimetry was performed to calculate patient's EE, and BEE was estimated by the Harris-Benedict formula. The metabolic state (EE/BEE x 100) was determined according to the following criteria: hypermetabolism, more than 130%; normal metabolism, between 90% and 130%; and hypometabolism, less than 90%. To determine the limits of agreement between EE and BEE, we performed a Bland-Altman analysis.
Results:
The average EE of patients was 6339 +/- 1119 kJ/d. Two patients were hypermetabolic (11.8%), 4 were hypometabolic (23.5%), and 11 normometabolic (64.7%). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean of -126 +/- 2135 kJ/d for EE and BEE. Only one patient was outside the limits of agreement between the 2 methods (indirect calorimetry and Harris-Benedict).
Conclusions:
The calculation of energy needs can be done with the equation of Harris-Benedict associated with lower values of correction factors (approximately 10%) to avoid overfeeding, with constant monitoring of anthropometric and biochemical parameters to assess the nutritional changing and adjust the infusion of energy.
More Related Videos
04:54Using a Combination of Indirect Calorimetry, Infrared Thermography, and Blood Glucose Levels to Measure Brown Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis in Humans
Published on: June 2, 2023
05:16Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
