Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Flow Cytometry01:23

Flow Cytometry

The development of flow cytometry techniques began in 1934 with initial attempts by Andrew Moldavan, a bacteriologist who counted the cells in a flowing capillary system. Moldavan pumped cells through a capillary tube focused under a microscope for visualization. The invention of photometry allowed the measurement of differentially-stained cells, and Louis Kamentsky developed the first multiparameter flow cytometer in 1965 to identify and count the cancer cells in cervical tissue specimens.
In...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolic imaging for gamete and embryo assessment through advanced microscopy technologies: a novel avenue for artificial intelligence?

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Deep learning-based segmentation of human oocytes with cross-dataset evaluation.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same author

Redox responsive nanosystems for medicine: from reactive species mapping to precision treatment.

Advanced drug delivery reviews·2026
Same author

CbAgo-enriched Cas12a biosensor for cancer mutations screening.

Analytica chimica acta·2026
Same author

Multidimensional data analysis and classification using SMIAL.

Communications biology·2026
Same author

Carbon monoxide dehydrogenase-encoding microorganisms in volcanic astrobiological analogues: an enzyme system to investigate the evolution of life.

FEMS microbiology ecology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Fluorescent Lateral Flow Immunoassay Based on Quantum Dots Nanobeads
07:13

Fluorescent Lateral Flow Immunoassay Based on Quantum Dots Nanobeads

Published on: June 28, 2024

Potential use of quantum dots in flow cytometry.

Raquel Ibáñez-Peral1, Peter L Bergquist1,2, Malcolm R Walter3

  • 1Department of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.

International Journal of Molecular Sciences
|March 31, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Quantum dots (QDs) offer significant advantages for flow cytometric measurements (FCM). QDs require 100-fold less concentration than FITC for detection above background fluorescence in bead-based assays.

Keywords:
Quantum dotsautofluorescencedetection limitflow cytometryfluorescent detection

More Related Videos

Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging
17:14

Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging

Published on: October 9, 2012

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots
10:16

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots

Published on: October 23, 2014

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Fluorescent Lateral Flow Immunoassay Based on Quantum Dots Nanobeads
07:13

Fluorescent Lateral Flow Immunoassay Based on Quantum Dots Nanobeads

Published on: June 28, 2024

Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging
17:14

Compact Quantum Dots for Single-molecule Imaging

Published on: October 9, 2012

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots
10:16

Production and Targeting of Monovalent Quantum Dots

Published on: October 23, 2014

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Cell Biology

Background:

  • Background fluorescence can hinder cell detection in assays.
  • Quantum dots (QDs) offer potential advantages over traditional fluorochromes.
  • Bead-based assays and flow cytometry are crucial for cell analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the application of QDs in flow cytometric measurements (FCM).
  • To compare the detection limits of QDs versus FITC in bead-based assays.
  • To assess QD performance in discriminating target cells from background fluorescence.

Main Methods:

  • Studied excitation-emission spectra of QDs.
  • Investigated QD binding to paramagnetic beads.
  • Performed flow cytometry (FCM) to compare fluorescence intensity of QD-labeled and FITC-labeled beads.
  • Determined minimum fluorophore concentrations for detection above autofluorescence.

Main Results:

  • QDs demonstrated distinct excitation-emission spectra.
  • QD labeling of paramagnetic beads was successful.
  • FCM analysis showed QDs are detectable at significantly lower concentrations than FITC.
  • Minimum QD concentration for detection was 100-fold less than FITC.

Conclusions:

  • QDs are highly advantageous for FCM, especially in environmental and bead-based applications.
  • QDs provide superior sensitivity for cell discrimination above background fluorescence compared to FITC.
  • The reduced concentration requirement for QDs enhances their utility in sensitive biological assays.