Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ruptured aortic aneurysm: a proposed classification.

M J Callam1, D Haiart, J A Murie

  • 1Vascular Surgery Unit, Royal Infirmary, Edinburgh, UK.

The British Journal of Surgery
|September 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letters.

Journal of wound care·2016
Same author

Review of classic research: Community clinics for leg ulcers.

Journal of wound care·2016
Same author

Letters.

Journal of wound care·2016
Same author

Reviews.

Journal of wound care·2016
Same author

Incidence and risk factors for venous reflux in the general population: Edinburgh Vein Study.

European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery·2014
Same author

Telangiectasia and venous reflux in the Edinburgh Vein Study.

Phlebology·2011
Same journal

Trimester-Specific Safety of Laparoscopic versus Open Abdominal Surgery During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

The Gut Microbiome in Surgical Oncology: Mechanisms, Perioperative Outcomes, and Therapeutic Opportunities.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Patient-led, home-based follow-up for colorectal cancer: the DISTANCE multicentre stepped-wedge cluster-randomised trial.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Correction to: Reduced secretory efficiency in parathyroid carcinoma: diagnostic value of the PTH-to-tumour-volume ratio.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Global disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma outcomes: multicentre study.

The British journal of surgery·2026
Same journal

Surgical Outcomes from Nationwide Implementation of the International Best-Practice for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (PREOPANC-4) study.

The British journal of surgery·2026
See all related articles

Operative mortality rates for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm vary widely. A new classification system for ruptured aortic aneurysm can standardize reporting and improve comparisons between institutions.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Reported operative mortality rates for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) show significant variation, from 14% to 70%.
  • Factors contributing to this variation include institutional expertise, available facilities, referral patterns, and case selection for surgery.
  • Standardized reporting is needed to accurately compare outcomes across different healthcare settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and validate a classification system for patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.
  • To demonstrate how this classification can explain variations in reported surgical mortality rates.
  • To highlight the benefits of a standardized reporting system for identifying management deficiencies and facilitating inter-center comparisons.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • A novel classification system for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm was developed.
  • The classification was prospectively applied to 100 consecutive patients with rAAA at the Edinburgh Vascular Surgical Unit.
  • Mortality data was analyzed in conjunction with the proposed classification.

    • Main Results:

    • The classification system demonstrated how surgical mortality rates could range from 29% to 52% using the same underlying mortality data.
    • This highlights the impact of patient selection and referral patterns on reported outcomes.
    • The system effectively illustrates the variability in reported mortality for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

    Conclusions:

    • A standardized classification system for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm is crucial for accurate outcome reporting.
    • Implementing such a system allows for the identification of institutional management deficiencies.
    • Standardized reporting facilitates meaningful comparisons of surgical results between different vascular centers.