Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

In vivo Macrophage Imaging Using MR Targeted Contrast Agent for Longitudinal Evaluation of Septic Arthritis
Published on: October 20, 2013
Magnetic resonance imaging in osteoarthritis: which method best reflects synovial membrane inflammation? Correlations
D Loeuille1, A-C Rat, J-C Goebel
1Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpitaux de Brabois, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Nancy, France. d.loeuille@chu-nancy.fr
Objectives:
: To study synovial membrane (SM) inflammation near the patella with different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) approaches performed using a T1-injected sequence in knee osteoarthritis (OA), and to compare MRI results with macroscopic, microscopic and clinical findings.
Methods:
Fifteen patients fulfilling American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for knee OA and requiring joint lavage completed a functional index (Lequesne's functional index) and a pain visual analog scale (VAS). SM inflammation near the patella was assessed on axial fat saturation post-injected T1 MRI images using three different methods: (1) semi-quantitative score=MRI synovitis score; (2) synovial membrane volume (SMV) analysis; (3) SMV with low (SMVL) (<0.3%/s(-1)), intermediate (SMVI) (0.3%/s(-1) to 1%/s(-1)) and high (SMVH) (> or =1%/s(-1)) speed of enhancement. Chondral lesions and SM inflammation were macroscopically graded and SM biopsies performed for microscopic scoring.
Results:
All MRI approaches exhibited excellent intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. MRI synovitis score correlated well with macroscopic (r=0.61, P=0.003) and total microscopic scores (r=0.55, P=0.03). Correlations between SMV and macroscopic (r=0.60, P=0.02) and microscopic congestion (r=0.63, P=0.01) were good. SMVH was correlated only with microscopic congestion (r=0.79, P=0.01). Low SMV was associated with neither macroscopic nor microscopic scores. However, it did correlate well with pain-VAS score (r=0.61, P=0.03) and moderately with a functional index (r=0.46, P=0.10).
Conclusion:
The three MRI approaches used here provided highly reproducible information on SM inflammation near the patella in knee OA. Compared to SMV, MRI synovitis score seems sufficient to assess synovial inflammation but high SMV is an appropriate indicator of vascular congestion, and low SMV reflects pain in knee OA.
Insights
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) effectively assesses synovial membrane inflammation in knee osteoarthritis. Different MRI techniques correlate with clinical pain and inflammation markers, aiding diagnosis and treatment.
Area of Science:
- Radiology
- Orthopedics
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Knee osteoarthritis (OA) involves synovial membrane (SM) inflammation.
- Accurate assessment of SM inflammation is crucial for managing knee OA.
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers non-invasive visualization of joint structures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate different MRI techniques for assessing patellar SM inflammation in knee OA.
- To compare MRI findings with macroscopic, microscopic, and clinical parameters.
- To determine the reproducibility and correlation of various MRI approaches.
Main Methods:
- Fifteen knee OA patients underwent MRI with a T1-injected sequence.
- Three MRI methods assessed SM inflammation: semi-quantitative synovitis score, SM volume (SMV), and SMV enhancement speed (SMVL, SMVI, SMVH).
- Clinical data (Lequesne's index, VAS pain) and macroscopic/microscopic scores were collected.
Main Results:
- All MRI approaches demonstrated excellent reproducibility.
- MRI synovitis score correlated well with macroscopic and microscopic inflammation.
- SMV enhancement speed (SMVH) correlated with microscopic congestion; low SMV correlated with pain (VAS).
Conclusions:
- T1-injected MRI techniques are reproducible for assessing patellar SM inflammation in knee OA.
- MRI synovitis score is adequate for general inflammation assessment.
- SMV enhancement and volume provide specific insights into vascular congestion and pain.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

