Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Developing PPE management tools for use in a pandemic.

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene·2026
Same author

Invisible Threats, Concrete Actions: Analyzing and Enhancing OSHA's Infectious Disease Framework.

Health security·2026
Same author

Inactivation of airborne pathogen surrogates by triethylene glycol.

Applied and environmental microbiology·2026
Same author

A Markov model for fate and transport of Staphylococcus aureus at a swine barn and proposed interventions to reduce worker exposures.

Annals of work exposures and health·2026
Same author

Associations between airborne crude oil chemicals and neurological symptoms among workers in the gulf long-term follow-up study.

The Science of the total environment·2025
Same author

Personal exposures to air pollutants and respiratory health among brick kiln workers and household members.

Environmental research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA
12:02

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

Occupational exposure decisions: can limited data interpretation training help improve accuracy?

Perry Logan1, Gurumurthy Ramachandran, John Mulhausen

  • 1Division of EnvironmentalHealth Sciences,Universityof Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. ramac002@umn.edu

The Annals of Occupational Hygiene
|April 1, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Occupational hygienists

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA
12:02

Collection and Extraction of Occupational Air Samples for Analysis of Fungal DNA

Published on: May 2, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health and Safety
  • Industrial Hygiene
  • Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Accurate exposure assessments are crucial for worker protection and resource allocation.
  • Occupational hygienists' judgments are vital for identifying and controlling hazardous exposures.
  • Evaluating the accuracy of these judgments, especially with limited data, is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To assess the accuracy and bias of occupational hygienists' exposure judgments.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a "rule of thumb" training on improving judgment accuracy.
  • To compare desktop judgments with Bayesian probabilistic analysis for validation.

Main Methods:

  • A desktop study using videos, task information, and limited air sampling data (0-8 samples).
  • Occupational hygienists provided qualitative and quantitative exposure judgments.
  • Data interpretation tests (DITs) were administered before and after rule of thumb training.

Main Results:

  • Rule of thumb training significantly improved both DIT accuracy (47% to 64%) and quantitative judgment accuracy (43% to 63%).
  • Training also reduced bias in DITs and quantitative judgments.
  • Qualitative judgment accuracy was not significantly impacted by the training.

Conclusions:

  • Simple statistical rules of thumb can significantly enhance occupational hygienists' judgment accuracy.
  • Routine use of statistical tools is recommended for exposure judgments based on monitoring data.
  • Improved judgment accuracy leads to better-informed decisions on worker protection strategies.