Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Prosopagnosia01:24

Prosopagnosia

Prosopagnosia, also known as face blindness, is the inability to recognize faces. In severe cases, individuals with prosopagnosia may not recognize close family members, including parents and spouses, by their faces. For instance, someone with prosopagnosia might walk past their child in a crowd, only realizing their mistake upon noticing their child's distinctive backpack or favorite jacket. Prosopagnosia specifically impairs facial recognition, while the recognition of other objects or...
Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...
Facial Feedback Hypothesis01:24

Facial Feedback Hypothesis

Charles Darwin proposed that facial expressions are an evolutionary adaptation for communication. He argued that these expressions are not influenced by culture but are universal across species. For example, a snarling expression with exposed teeth signals a threat in many animals, including humans. Darwin also suggested that displaying an emotion can intensify the feeling. Smiling, for example, could enhance one's sense of happiness. This idea laid the foundation for understanding the role of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Association of revascularization strategy with wound healing following toe amputation in chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

Journal of vascular surgery·2026
Same author

MRI-based morphology of ovarian clear cell carcinomas.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

Two case reports of ovarian clear cell carcinoma with central necrosis representing a mille-feuille-like appearance on contrast-enhanced MRI.

Radiology case reports·2026
Same author

Correction to "First Total Synthesis of Epicoccarine A via <i>O</i>- to <i>C</i>-Acyl Rearrangement Strategy".

Organic letters·2026
Same author

Hyperfamiliarity for faces: Preserved core face processing with altered medial temporal lobe connectivity in a single case study.

Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior·2026
Same author

Dyadic Person Similarity Predicts Similarity in Face Judgements.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Face detection in normal and prosopagnosic individuals.

Lúcia Garrido1, Brad Duchaine, Ken Nakayama

  • 1Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, University College London, London, UK. m.garrido@ucl.ac.uk

Journal of Neuropsychology
|April 1, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Face detection is impaired by inversion for both typical individuals and those with developmental prosopagnosia (DPs). DPs showed particular difficulty distinguishing upright faces from face parts.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome
08:31

Conscious and Non-conscious Representations of Emotional Faces in Asperger's Syndrome

Published on: July 31, 2016

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software
06:50

Analyzing Neural Activity and Connectivity Using Intracranial EEG Data with SPM Software

Published on: October 30, 2018

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
08:03

Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model

Published on: November 4, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • Face detection is crucial for face processing but less studied than other face-related tasks.
  • Inversion effects are well-documented in face recognition but less so in face detection.
  • Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) involves difficulties in face recognition, but face detection abilities are less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of face inversion on face detection performance.
  • To compare face detection abilities between individuals with and without developmental prosopagnosia.
  • To explore how DPs perform on tasks differentiating faces from non-faces and face parts.

Main Methods:

  • Two speeded face detection tasks were administered: Face versus Non-Face and Face versus Face Parts.
  • Participants included 14 control individuals and 14 individuals with developmental prosopagnosia (DPs).
  • Performance was measured by response accuracy and speed for upright and inverted stimuli.

Main Results:

  • Both control participants and DPs exhibited significant inversion effects, performing worse with inverted faces.
  • In the Face versus Face Parts task, DPs showed significantly lower performance on upright faces compared to controls.
  • DPs' performance on inverted faces did not differ significantly from controls in the Face versus Face Parts task.

Conclusions:

  • Face detection, like face recognition, is susceptible to the effects of inversion.
  • While some individuals with DP perform within normal limits on face detection, group differences emerge, particularly in discriminating faces from their parts.
  • These findings highlight the specific challenges DPs face even in basic face detection, especially with upright stimuli that resemble familiar configurations.