Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Milgram's Obedience to Authority

Obedience to authority is classically demonstrated in a more famous series of social psychology experiments performed by Stanley Milgram. He was a social psychology professor at Yale who was influenced by the trial of Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi war criminal. Eichmann’s defense for the atrocities he committed was that he was “just following orders.”

Parenting Styles

Parenting Styles

Diana Baumrind's four parenting styles — authoritarian, authoritative, neglectful, and permissive — each influence children's socio-emotional development differently.
Authoritarian Parenting
This style is strict and controlling, with little room for open dialogue. Authoritarian parents demand obedience and often enforce rules with minimal warmth. Children raised this way may lack social skills and initiative, usually comparing themselves to others unfavorably.
Authoritative Parenting
This...

Obedience

Obedience

According to obedience research, we may harm others under the forceful pressures of an authority figure (Milgram, 1974). How about if the inappropriate orders were delivered with less force? The increasing interdependence between nurses and physicians compelled Hofling and his colleagues to explore nurses’ reactions to a potentially harmful medical request made by the perceived authority figure, the doctor (Hofling, Brotzman, Dalrymple, Graves, & Pierce, 1966). In this situation, obedience...

Sources of Law

Sources of Law

Laws form the essential rules set by governing authorities to shape and control societal behavior. In nursing, laws guide actions, safeguard patient rights, define nurses' scope of practice, and maintain professional standards. Understanding the legal framework governing nursing involves recognizing four primary sources of law: constitutional, statutory, administrative (regulatory), and common law.
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

Triarchic Theory of Intelligence

Robert Sternberg's triarchic theory of intelligence posits that intelligence is composed of three distinct but interrelated components: analytical, creative, and practical intelligence.

Three Force Member

Three Force Member

A rigid body subjected to three forces acting at three points is known as a three-force member. These forces must have concurrent lines of action, except for parallel forces, where the lines of action are parallel.
For example, consider a dumpster connected to a pin support at point A and a pin attached to a hydraulic cylinder at point B.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Resistance and Revolution: Authority and the Analytic Situation During COVID-19.

The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2022

Same author

Generativity and Its Vicissitudes in <i>Logan</i> and the <i>X-Men</i> Series.

Psychoanalytic review·2019

Same author

Trauma and sympathy in Buck.

The International journal of psycho-analysis·2014

Same author

Psychoanalysis naturalized.

The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2014

Same author

Silence, now. Panel reports.

Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association·2013

Same author

Interpretation domestic and foreign.

The Psychoanalytic quarterly·2013

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Three varieties of authority.

Jason A Wheeler Vega¹

¹New York University Psychoanalytic Institute, USA. jasonwheelerphd@gmail.com

The Psychoanalytic Quarterly

|April 2, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study proposes focusing on knowledge claims and authority norms to address epistemological doubts and skeptical worries. It highlights how intersubjective thought refinement secures users from radical error, with clinical applications discussed.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

Philosophy of Language
Epistemology
Clinical Psychology

Background:

Traditional epistemology faces challenges in addressing doubts about knowledge.
Skeptical worries can impede clear communication and understanding.
Existing frameworks may not adequately account for the social nature of thought.

Purpose of the Study:

To propose an alternative framework for understanding knowledge claims.
To demonstrate how focusing on authority norms can replace traditional epistemological projects.
To show how intersubjectivity mitigates skeptical concerns and secures against radical error.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of knowledge claims and authority norms (first-, second-, and third-person).
Examination of the intersubjective origin and refinement of thought.
Application of the framework to clinical examples, interpretive authority, and therapeutic self-disclosure.

Main Results:

A focus on knowledge claims and authority norms offers a viable alternative to traditional epistemology.
Intersubjective processes in thought development protect competent language users from radical error.
The framework provides practical insights into clinical applications like interpretive authority and self-disclosure.

Conclusions:

Shifting focus from 'what can be known' to 'what can be said' based on authority norms resolves epistemological doubts.
Understanding the intersubjective basis of thought is crucial for overcoming skepticism.
This approach has practical implications for clinical practice and understanding communication.