Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Management of chronic allograft nephropathy: a systematic review
Leora M Birnbaum1, Mark Lipman, Steven Paraskevas
1Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Abstract:
Despite improving immunosuppressive protocols in renal transplantation, chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) remains a major impediment to long-term graft survival. The optimal immunosuppressive regimen for a patient with CAN is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the various immunosuppressive management strategies of biopsy-proven CAN and of chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) (no biopsy). A systematic review of randomized trials (n = 12 trials with 635 patients) was conducted. Studies included patients who were >6 mo post-transplant. All patients were on a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI), most often cyclosporine, and were randomized to convert to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, or sirolimus (Rapa) or to add azathioprine, MMF or Rapa to their current regimen. Follow-up time was 6 to 36 mo. The outcome measures evaluated were renal function in 11 of 12 studies and repeat renal biopsy results in one study. The methodological quality scores of the trials were generally low, using the Jadad scale (median value 2/5). Results varied between studies but suggested that CNI withdrawal is safe and that conversion to MMF or Rapa may be beneficial. The incidence of adverse effects ranged from 0% to 68% between the studies, and medication withdrawal occurred in 0% to 24% of patients. The review did not result in a consensus regarding the management of CAN and CAD. Further studies are required to determine the best therapeutic option for patients with CAD and CAN.
Insights
Optimizing immunosuppression for chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is crucial. While calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal may be safe, converting to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus might benefit kidney transplant patients.
Area of Science:
- Nephrology
- Transplantation Immunology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) and chronic allograft dysfunction (CAD) significantly hinder long-term kidney transplant survival.
- Current immunosuppressive protocols require optimization for managing these conditions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate immunosuppressive management strategies for biopsy-proven CAN and non-biopsy-proven CAD.
- To identify optimal therapeutic options for improving graft survival in kidney transplant recipients.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review of 12 randomized trials involving 635 kidney transplant patients.
- Analysis of studies where patients, post-transplant and on calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), were randomized to switch or add immunosuppressants like mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus (Rapa).
Main Results:
- Results varied, but suggested calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal is safe.
- Conversion to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or sirolimus (Rapa) showed potential benefits for renal function.
- Adverse effects ranged widely (0%–68%), and medication withdrawal occurred in 0%–24% of patients.
Conclusions:
- The review did not establish a consensus on the best management strategy for CAN and CAD.
- Further research is necessary to determine optimal immunosuppressive regimens for patients with chronic kidney allograft dysfunction.
Related Concept Videos
Chronic Kidney Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Kidney Transplant III: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant I: Introduction
Chronic Kidney Disease IV: Nursing Management
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Diabetic Nephropathy
