Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least squares (OLS)...
¹H NMR: Complex Splitting01:13

¹H NMR: Complex Splitting

A proton M that is coupled to a proton X results in doublet signals for M. However, NMR-active nuclei can be simultaneously coupled to more than one nonequivalent nucleus. When M is coupled to a second proton A, such as in styrene oxide, each peak in the doublet is split into another doublet.
Splitting diagrams or splitting tree diagrams are routinely used to depict such complex couplings. While drawing splitting diagrams, the splitting with the larger coupling constant is usually applied first.
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Resonance and Hybrid Structures02:16

Resonance and Hybrid Structures

According to the theory of resonance, if two or more Lewis structures with the same arrangement of atoms can be written for a molecule, ion, or radical, the actual distribution of electrons is an average of that shown by the various Lewis structures.
Resonance Structures and Resonance Hybrids
The Lewis structure of a nitrite anion (NO2−) may actually be drawn in two different ways, distinguished by the locations of the N–O and N=O bonds.
¹H NMR: Pople Notation01:09

¹H NMR: Pople Notation

The Pople nomenclature system classifies spin systems based on the difference between their chemical shifts. Coupled spins are denoted by capital letters with subscripts indicating the number of equivalent nuclei. When the coupled nuclei have well-separated chemical shifts, they are assigned letters that are far apart in the alphabet, such as A and X. When the difference in chemical shifts is small, coupled nuclei are named using adjacent letters of the alphabet (AB, MN, or XY).
A proton...
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores help...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026
Same author

Long-Term Opioid Therapy Tapering and Risk of Substance Use Disorder and Overdose: Differences by Opioid Dose and Duration.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Measured and Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rates and Risk of Adverse Health Outcomes.

JAMA·2026
Same author

Somatic morbidity in bipolar disorders.

International journal of bipolar disorders·2026
Same author

Evaluation of clinical utility in emulated clinical trials.

European journal of epidemiology·2026
Same author

Inflammatory and cholesterol risks and rates of major cardiovascular events among patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in routine care.

European heart journal open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Propensity scores and M-structures.

Arvid Sjölander

    Statistics in Medicine
    |April 3, 2009
    PubMed
    Summary

    Propensity score methods can introduce selection bias in the M-structure, contrary to some assumptions. This analysis clarifies the limitations of propensity scores when unmeasured covariates are present.

    Area of Science:

    • Statistics
    • Causal Inference
    • Epidemiology

    Background:

    • A question was raised regarding propensity score use in an M-structure with unmeasured covariates.
    • The M-structure involves a binary exposure (z), a response (r), a measured covariate (x), and unmeasured covariates (u1, u2).
    • Previous discussions clarified propensity score use but did not directly address the M-structure bias concern.

    Discussion:

    • This paper directly answers whether propensity score methods introduce bias in the M-structure.
    • It explains why standard propensity score application is inappropriate for this specific causal structure.
    • The analysis uses notation consistent with established propensity score literature.

    Key Insights:

    • Propensity score methods do induce bias when applied to the M-structure.

    More Related Videos

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
    08:27

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

    Published on: September 27, 2019

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
    06:55

    Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

    Published on: January 8, 2020

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
    08:27

    Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

    Published on: September 27, 2019

  • Unmeasured covariates in the M-structure violate assumptions required for unbiased propensity score estimation.
  • Understanding these limitations is crucial for accurate causal inference.

    • Outlook:

    • Further research should explore alternative methods for causal inference in the presence of unmeasured confounding.
    • Clarifying the applicability of statistical methods across different causal structures is essential.
    • This work highlights the importance of careful model specification in observational studies.