Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Vascular intervention in stroke prevention: endarterectomy and angioplasty
1Stroke Research Group, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Insights
Carotid endarterectomy effectively treats severe symptomatic carotid stenosis, but its benefit diminishes with moderate stenosis or asymptomatic cases. Routine carotid stenting is not yet justified for patients eligible for surgery.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Neurology
- Cardiovascular Medicine
Background:
- Carotid stenosis is a significant risk factor for stroke and transient ischemic attack.
- Treatment strategies differ for symptomatic versus asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
- Carotid endarterectomy is a primary surgical intervention for severe symptomatic stenosis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the efficacy of carotid endarterectomy and endovascular treatment for carotid stenosis.
- To evaluate the impact of timing and severity on treatment outcomes.
- To determine the current role of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy.
Main Methods:
- Review of landmark randomized trials on carotid endarterectomy.
- Analysis of data from early and subsequent trials of endovascular treatment (carotid stenting).
- Consideration of improvements in medical management, including statin therapy.
Main Results:
- Carotid endarterectomy is beneficial for severe symptomatic stenosis, especially when performed within two weeks of symptom onset.
- Benefits are reduced for moderate stenosis and potentially harmful for stenosis less than 50%.
- Current evidence does not support routine carotid stenting as a substitute for endarterectomy in surgical candidates.
Conclusions:
- Carotid endarterectomy remains the standard for select symptomatic severe carotid stenosis patients.
- Asymptomatic carotid stenosis generally does not warrant routine surgical intervention due to limited benefits.
- Further randomized trials are necessary to establish the definitive role of carotid stenting.
Abstract:
Carotid stenosis is a major risk factor for stroke and transient ischaemic attack. Asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenoses need to be considered separately. Carotid endarterectomy was established as the treatment of choice for recently symptomatic severe carotid stenosis by two landmark trials. The effect of surgery is much less in patients with moderate carotid stenosis and harmful in patients with stenosis of less than 50%. Suitable patients should be operated on within 2 weeks of symptoms because the benefit of endarterectomy declines rapidly with increasing time between symptom onset and treatment. The benefits of endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis shown in the randomised trials were much less. Improvements in medical treatment, especially increasing statin use after the trials were started, need to be taken into consideration when interpreting the trials, and most neurologists conclude that routine endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis is not justified. Early trials of endovascular treatment of carotid stenosis suggested that endovascular treatment might be a safe and effective alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, subsequent trials have so far failed to provide enough evidence to justify routine carotid stenting as an alternative to endarterectomy in patients fit for surgery. More data from ongoing randomised trials of stenting versus endarterectomy are needed to determine the role of stenting in the treatment of carotid stenosis.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Atherosclerosis III: Management
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
