Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Linearization of the Bradford Protein Assay
Published on: April 12, 2010
The cost of linearization
1Department of Physics and Astronomy, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA 22807, USA. dmorel@stetson.edu
Abstract:
Linear additivity of synaptic input is a pervasive assumption in computational neuroscience, and previously Bernander et al. (Journal of Neurophysiology 72:2743-2753, 1994) point out that the sublinear additivity of a passive neuronal model can be linearized with voltage-dependent currents. Here we re-examine this perspective in light of more recent findings and issues. Based on in vivo intracellular recordings, three voltage-dependent conductances seem to be of interest for pyramidal cells of the forebrain: two of them are amplifying, I ( NaP ) and I ( h ); and one of them is attenuating, I ( A ). Based on particular I-V characteristics reported in the literature, each of these three voltage-dependent currents linearizes a particular range of synaptic excitation. Computational simulations use a steady-state, one-compartment model. They establish maximal linear ranges, where supralinear effects-due to adding too much of any one conductance-limit these ranges. Specific, carefully selected pairwise combinations of these currents can linearize larger ranges than either current alone. In terms of parameters, the steady-state I-V characteristics of each current are critical. On the other hand, the relationships between the results here and resting conductance to ground, synaptic conductance, and number of active synapses are simple and easily scaled; thus in regard to these three latter dependences, the results here are easily generalized. Finally, to improve our understanding of evolved function, the relative metabolic costs of linearization are quantified. In one case, there is a clear preference arising from this cost consideration (a particular I ( h ), I ( NaP ) pairing is less costly compared to a particular I ( A ), I ( NaP ) pairing that produces an equivalent, linearized range). However in other cases, a preference will depend on the required range; but in any event, the largest linearized range observed here (28 mV), from a combination of I ( h ) and I ( A ), is significantly more costly than the 20 mV range that the I ( h ), I ( NaP ) pair produces.
More Related Videos
06:26Direct Linear Transformation for the Measurement of In-Situ Peripheral Nerve Strain During Stretching
Published on: January 12, 2024
06:45Design and Application of a Fault Detection Method Based on Adaptive Filters and Rotational Speed Estimation for an Electro-Hydrostatic Actuator
Published on: October 28, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Linearization and Approximation
Application of Linearization and Approximation
Linear Equations
Linear Approximation in Time Domain
For a simple pendulum with a mass evenly distributed along its length and the center of mass located at half the pendulum's length, the...
Linear Approximation in Frequency Domain
In contrast, nonlinear systems do not inherently possess these properties. However, for small deviations around an operating point, a nonlinear system can often be approximated as linear.
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...