Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Critical Thinking II

Critical Thinking II

Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered Care

Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

Critical Thinking I

Critical Thinking I

Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...

Clinical Trials

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be safely...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Caregivers' burden and psychiatric morbidity among informal caregivers of older adults: results from a national survey.

BMC geriatrics·2026

Same author

Adverse childhood experiences and psychiatric outcomes among women with schizophrenia and depression in Singapore.

European journal of psychotraumatology·2026

Same author

Mapping the network structure of dementia and its associated factors among older adults in Singapore: evidence from two national cross-sectional studies.

BMC geriatrics·2026

Same author

Association of suicidality with positive mental health: results from a nationwide cross-sectional study.

Singapore medical journal·2026

Same author

Conversational AI and psychosis: A technological folie à deux.

Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2026

Same author

Sociodemographic and clinical determinants of the dementia treatment gap in Singapore and their evolution over a decade.

Scientific reports·2026

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

How clinician-scientists think.

Siow Ann Chong¹

¹Medical Board (Research), Institute of Mental Health, Singapore. siow_ann_chong@imh.com.sg

Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore

|April 7, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Science involves human drama, where thinking, personality, and circumstances combine for discoveries. This interaction can lead to breakthroughs but sometimes results in ethical challenges or failures.

More Related Videos

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Published on: October 1, 2007

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Using Micro-Electro-Mechanical Systems (MEMS) to Develop Diagnostic Tools

Published on: October 1, 2007

Area of Science:

Explores the intersection of cognitive science, psychology, and the philosophy of science.

Background:

Scientific progress is often portrayed as purely objective.
However, science is a human endeavor influenced by personal and situational factors.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the interplay of cognitive styles, personality traits, and environmental circumstances in scientific discovery.
To analyze how these elements contribute to both groundbreaking achievements and potential ethical ambiguities.

Main Methods:

Qualitative analysis of historical scientific case studies.
Exploration of psychological and sociological factors influencing research outcomes.

Main Results:

Identified specific cognitive and personality profiles associated with major scientific breakthroughs.
Highlighted instances where the scientific process led to morally complex situations or outright errors.

Conclusions:

Scientific discovery is a complex human process, not solely reliant on logic.
Understanding these human elements is crucial for navigating the ethical landscape of scientific advancement.