Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion.
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
Scientific Laws and Theories02:31

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
Scientific Nature of Social Psychology01:30

Scientific Nature of Social Psychology

Social psychology is a scientific discipline dedicated to understanding how individuals think, feel, and behave in social contexts. Unlike common sense, which relies on anecdotal experiences and intuition, social psychology employs systematic research and empirical methods to ensure objectivity and reliability. This distinction is fundamental in distinguishing scientifically supported findings from mere speculation.Four fundamental scientific values guide a structured approach to research in...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Governing new technologies that stop biological time: Preparing for prolonged biopreservation of human organs in transplantation.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2024
Same author

Practical considerations for reinterpretation of individual genetic variants.

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2023
Same author

Global Governance of Human Genome Editing: What Are the Rules?

Annual review of genomics and human genetics·2021
Same author

Does the law require reinterpretation and return of revised genomic results?

Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics·2021
Same author

Legislating in the time of a pandemic: window of opportunity or invitation for recklessness?

Journal of law and the biosciences·2020
Same author

Can Clinical Genetics Laboratories be Sued for Medical Malpractice?

Annals of health law and life sciences·2020
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

The problems with forbidding science.

Gary E Marchant1, Lynda L Pope

  • 1Center for the Study of Law, Science & Technology, Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-7906, USA. gary.marchant@asu.edu

Science and Engineering Ethics
|April 8, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Regulating scientific research faces challenges due to law's imprecision and global reach. Alternative methods like voluntary standards and codes of conduct may offer more effective governance for scientific knowledge.

More Related Videos

A Virtual Simulation Experiment of Mechanics: Material Deformation and Failure Based on Scanning Electron Microscopy
06:54

A Virtual Simulation Experiment of Mechanics: Material Deformation and Failure Based on Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: January 20, 2023

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 3. Aerobiology
11:13

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 3. Aerobiology

Published on: October 3, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease
23:53

Ole Isacson: Development of New Therapies for Parkinson's Disease

Published on: April 29, 2007

A Virtual Simulation Experiment of Mechanics: Material Deformation and Failure Based on Scanning Electron Microscopy
06:54

A Virtual Simulation Experiment of Mechanics: Material Deformation and Failure Based on Scanning Electron Microscopy

Published on: January 20, 2023

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 3. Aerobiology
11:13

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 3. Aerobiology

Published on: October 3, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Legal studies
  • Science policy
  • Ethics in research

Background:

  • Scientific research traditionally faces incidental regulations (time, place).
  • Increasing calls question the premise of unrestricted scientific knowledge.
  • Debate exists on using law for substantive research restrictions, especially for dual-use or ethically contentious research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the challenges of using legal frameworks to substantively regulate scientific research.
  • To explore alternative, potentially more effective, regulatory mechanisms for scientific endeavors.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of legal and regulatory challenges in scientific research.
  • Examination of the limitations of traditional legal tools for complex scientific issues.
  • Review of non-traditional legal tools and voluntary standards.

Main Results:

  • Legal regulation of scientific research faces inherent imprecision and enforcement difficulties due to its complex and international nature.
  • Predicting consequences of legal restrictions on research is challenging, compounded by legislative inertia and external influences.
  • Non-traditional legal tools like norms, codes of conduct, and voluntary standards present viable alternatives.

Conclusions:

  • Substantive legal restrictions on scientific research present significant practical and predictable challenges.
  • A combination of non-traditional legal tools offers a more appropriate and effective approach to regulating problematic scientific research.
  • Focusing on norms, codes of conduct, and voluntary standards can better navigate the complexities of modern scientific advancement.