Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

FISH for Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis
Published on: February 23, 2011
[The application and significance in prenatal diagnosis using G-banding, fluorescence in situ hybridization and
Wei-she Zhang1, Qi-neng Chen, Xin-hua Wu
1Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410008 People's Republic of China.
Objective:
To investigate the procedure and the value of G-banding, fluorescence in sit hybridization (FISH) and comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) techniques in prenatal diagnosis.
Methods:
Karyotype analyses with three diagnostic procedures, G-banding, G-banding and FISH, G-banding, FISH and CGH, were performed in the amniotic fluid samples taken from 102 fetuses at gestational ages 16-24 weeks. And the significance was valued in prenatal diagnosis.
Results:
In the first procedure of karyotype analysis, 98 cases were diagnosed, 2 cases were not conformed while 2 cases were failed in all 102 cases. In the second procedure, 2 cases were determined, 1 case was not conformed and 1 case was still failed. In the third step, 2 cases were diagnosed. The diagnostic rate of the karyotype reached to 100% (102/102 cases) using all the three procedures. In total, seven cases with chromosomal abnormality were diagnosed. Four cases, 1 case and 2 cases were identified in the first step (4/7, 57.1%), the second (1/7, 14.3%) and the third (2/7, 28.5%), respectively.
Conclusion:
It can help improve the diagnostic rate of chromosomal aberrations and standardize diagnostic procedure to perform the three detecting steps in prenatal diagnosis.
Related Concept Videos
Karyotyping
FISH - Fluorescent In-situ Hybridization

