Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Thermochemical Studies of Ni(II) and Zn(II) Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 8, 2022
Energetics of [Fe(NCH)6]2+ via CASPT2 calculations: a spin-crossover perspective
Mikaël Kepenekian1, Vincent Robert, Boris Le Guennic
1Université de Lyon, Laboratoire de Chimie, CNRS-Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 46 allée d'Italie, 69007 Lyon, France.
Abstract:
The importance of basis sets and active spaces in the determination of the potential energy curves and relevant energy differences in the O(h)-symmetry model system [Fe(NCH)(6)](2+) is analyzed using the Complete Active Space Self-Consistent Field (CASSCF) method and subsequent second-order perturbative treatment (CASPT2). By comparison of a series of atomic basis sets contraction, it is concluded that a balanced description of the Fe 7s6p5d3f2g1h and N 4s3p1d partners is needed to reach convergence upon the potential energy surface descriptions. Since the spin-crossover phenomenon involves the simultaneous change in the spin nature and expansion of the coordination sphere of the metal ion (i.e., lengthening of the Fe-N distances), the standard 10 electrons/12 orbitals complete active space is confronted to a chemically intuitive 18 electrons/15 orbitals picture. The role of a second d-shell is finally examined using the extended RAS strategy. Using a valence-bond type analysis, it is shown that the so-called d(') orbitals allow for a significant charge redistribution (approximately 0.5 electron) along the transition. Our calculations are compared to reference coupled-cluster estimations.
More Related Videos
08:55Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
13:56Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
Published on: October 12, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond Theory
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling