Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

07:09
In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
Human ex vivo bone tissue strains around immediately-loaded implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses
Ali Murat Kökat1, Ayhan Cömert, Ibrahim Tekdemir
1Department of Prosthodontics, Yeditepe University, Goztepe, Istanbul.
Implant Dentistry
|April 11, 2009
Summary
Fewer implants supporting fixed prostheses in the jawbone result in higher bone strain. A 3-implant design showed significantly greater bone strain than 4- or 5-implant designs, potentially increasing implant failure risk.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Biomechanics
- Biomaterials
Background:
- Immediately-loaded dental implants are crucial for restoring function in edentulous patients.
- Understanding bone strain is vital for predicting implant success and longevity.
- The number of implants used in fixed prostheses can influence stress distribution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify and qualify bone strains around dental implants supporting mandibular fixed prostheses.
- To investigate the effect of the number of implant supports (3, 4, or 5 implants) on bone strain.
- To assess the biomechanical implications of different implant configurations for immediate loading.
Main Methods:
- Strain gauges were placed on the labial bone surrounding 5 Straumann implants in human cadaver mandibles.
- Installation torque and resonance frequency analyses measured initial implant stability.
- Controlled loading experiments were conducted on 3-, 4-, and 5-implant supported full-arch prostheses.
Main Results:
- Installation torque values ranged from 42.12 to 145.67 N cm, and implant stability quotient values were between 61 and 80.
- The 3-implant configuration exhibited the highest bone strain magnitudes.
- Bone strain tended to be similar between the 4- and 5-implant designs (P < 0.05).
Conclusions:
- A 3-implant design generates significantly higher bone strain compared to 4- or 5-implant designs.
- Increased bone strain with fewer implants may elevate the risk of supporting implant failure.
- 4- and 5-implant configurations may offer comparable clinical outcomes regarding bone strain distribution.

