Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Association Areas of the Cortex01:21

Association Areas of the Cortex

Association areas are regions of the cerebral cortex that do not have a specific sensory or motor function. Instead, they integrate and interpret information from various sources to enable higher cognitive processes such as memory, learning, and decision-making. Some key association areas include the following:
Prefrontal Association Area: This area is located in the frontal lobe and is involved in planning, decision-making, and moderating social behavior. It connects with primary motor areas,...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same authorSame journal

Pupil reflexes generate the peripheral drift illusion due to ON/OFF motion responses.

Vision research·2026
Same author

Steerable autoencoders underlying remapping, spatiotopy, and visual stability.

Current opinion in neurobiology·2026
Same author

The Effect of Target-Flanker Similarity in Dense Crowding.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026
Same author

Distinct spatial patterns of flanker interference differentiate visual crowding from flanker compatibility effects in the Eriksen task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2026
Same author

Frame effects across space and time.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

The bookend effect.

i-Perception·2026
Same journal

Computational and mathematical models in vision: Quantitative approaches to understanding visual perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Complex interactions between lightness, chroma, and hue in color ensemble perception.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Driving with autism spectrum disorder: Exploring the impact of tactile hazard warnings on gaze behavior and hazard responses.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Early visual processing in adults with ADHD: evidence from contrast sensitivity, spatial integration, and external noise.

Vision research·2026
Same journal

Perceived direction of glass patterns can flip by 90°: A neural model.

Vision research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Bilateral field advantage in visual crowding.

Ramakrishna Chakravarthi1, Patrick Cavanagh

  • 1New York University, Psychology and Neural Science, 6 Washington Pl. 8th Floor, New York, NY 10003, USA. rama@nyu.edu

Vision Research
|April 14, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual crowding shows a bilateral advantage, meaning attention is more efficient when targets are in separate visual hemifields. This suggests distinct attentional resources for each hemifield, improving target identification in crowded displays.

More Related Videos

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention
05:36

Central and Divided Visual Field Presentation of Emotional Images to Measure Hemispheric Differences in Motivated Attention

Published on: November 16, 2017

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Visual perception
  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Visual crowding impairs object recognition when targets are flanked by distractors.
  • Attentional resources are known to be involved in overcoming crowding.
  • Previous research suggests independent attentional resources for the left and right visual hemifields in tasks like multiple object tracking.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether separate attentional resources exist for the left and right visual hemifields during visual crowding.
  • To determine if precueing locations in different hemifields improves performance in a crowded visual search task.
  • To compare performance between unilateral and bilateral precueing conditions under crowding.

Main Methods:

  • Participants identified the orientation of a target 'T' amidst distractors in a circular display.
  • Two locations were precued: either in the same hemifield (unilateral) or different hemifields (bilateral).
  • Performance was compared between unilateral and bilateral precueing conditions, with and without distractors.

Main Results:

  • A significant bilateral advantage was observed: target identification was better when precued locations were in different hemifields compared to the same hemifield.
  • This bilateral advantage disappeared when distractors were absent, indicating its dependence on crowding.
  • A cost was associated with attending to two unilaterally presented targets, but this cost was reduced with bilateral presentation.

Conclusions:

  • Visual crowding, like other attentional tasks, benefits from separate attentional resources in the left and right visual hemifields.
  • The findings support the hypothesis of independent attentional mechanisms for each hemifield, particularly under conditions of visual clutter.
  • This suggests a neural or cognitive division of attentional labor across visual hemifields for efficient visual processing.