Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Robbers Cave04:49

Robbers Cave

During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension could be...
Design Consideration01:22

Design Consideration

Designing a structure involves a series of considerations, primarily the material's ultimate strength, calculated through tests that measure changes under increased force until the material reaches its breaking point or limit. The ultimate load, where the material breaks, is divided by its original cross-sectional area, resulting in the ultimate normal stress or strength. The ultimate shearing stress is another significant factor taken into account.
The factor of safety is another key aspect...
Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Segmental Zoster Paresis With Comorbid Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Cureus·2025
Same author

Future Aviary Design: The Science of Circular Flight Aviaries for Avian Welfare.

Zoo biology·2025
Same author

Behavior of Rio Sao Francisco Piranhas in Response to Changes in Space and Density.

Zoo biology·2025
Same author

Using 3D Photogrammetry to Quantify Usable Space in Zoo-Housed Primate Habitats.

American journal of primatology·2025
Same author

Using an Oral Sugar Test to Biologically Validate the Use of a Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay to Measure Salivary Insulin in Western Lowland Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla).

Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology·2025
Same author

Lack of reinforcement is hard to "bear": Assessing judgment bias in grizzly bears (<i>Ursus arctos horribilis</i>).

Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Facility design for Bachelor Gorilla groups.

Jon C Coe1, Dwight Scott, Kristen E Lukas

  • 1Jon Coe Design, Healesville, Victoria, Australia.

Zoo Biology
|April 16, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Designing specialized zoo habitats for bachelor gorillas is crucial for managing aggression and promoting well-being. Key features include easy caregiver access, visual barriers, and safe outlets for natural behaviors to ensure successful group management.

More Related Videos

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions
10:00

Methods of Pairing and Pair Maintenance of New Zealand White Rabbits (Oryctolagus Cuniculus) Via Behavioral Ethogram, Monitoring, and Interventions

Published on: March 16, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Primate Husbandry and Welfare
  • Zoo Facility Design
  • Behavioral Ecology

Background:

  • Standard ape facility designs often overlook the unique social dynamics of bachelor gorilla groups.
  • Maturing or silverback male gorillas may exhibit escalating aggression, necessitating specific management strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the specialized facility design needs for bachelor gorilla groups in zoological settings.
  • To identify key environmental and social provisions that enhance the well-being of bachelor gorillas.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of facility design features discussed during the Bachelor Gorilla 2000 Workshop.
  • Review of essential elements for managing inter-male aggression and promoting positive social interactions.
  • Consideration of caregiver intervention requirements and environmental modification capabilities.

Main Results:

  • Facility designs must incorporate features that reduce aggression, increase affiliation, and provide escape routes.
  • Easy caregiver access to gorillas, both on- and off-exhibit, is beneficial for intervention and monitoring.
  • Provisions for species-typical behaviors and safe outlets are essential for managing group dynamics.

Conclusions:

  • Thoughtful facility design is critical for the successful long-term management of bachelor gorilla groups.
  • Creative habitat design and ongoing research into group dynamics will improve gorilla welfare in zoos.
  • Environmental and social management strategies must adapt to the evolving needs of bachelor gorillas.