Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Following in Real Time the Impact of Pneumococcal Virulence Factors in an Acute Mouse Pneumonia Model Using Bioluminescent Bacteria
Published on: February 23, 2014
Differentiation of bacterial and viral community-acquired pneumonia in children
Massimiliano Don1, Francesca Valent, Matti Korppi
1Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, DPMSC, University of Udine, Italy. max.don@libero.it
Background:
Microbe-specific diagnosis of pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and the distinction between typical-bacterial, atypical-bacterial and viral cases are difficult. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of four serum non-specific inflammatory markers and their combinations, supplemented by chest radiological findings, in the screening of bacterial etiology of pediatric CAP.
Methods:
Serum procalcitonin (PCT), serum C-reactive protein (CRP), blood erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and white blood cell (WBC) counts were determined in 101 children with CAP, all confirmed on chest radiograph. Evidence of etiology was achieved in 68 patients (67%) mainly using a serologic test panel including 15 pathogens.
Results:
For the combination of CRP > 100 mg/L, WBC count > 15 x 10(9)/L, PCT > 1.0 ng/mL and ESR > 65 mm/h, the likelihood ratio for a positive test result (LR+) was 2.7 in the distinction between pneumococcal and viral CAP and 3.9 between atypical and viral CAP. If there was a higher value in one of these four parameters (CRP > 200 mg/L, WBC count > 22 x 10(9)/L, PCT > 18 ng/mL or ESR > 90 mm/h) LR+ changed to >or=3.4, which means a significant increase from pre-test to post-test disease probability. An alveolar radiological infiltration was associated with higher values in non-specific inflammatory markers when compared with interstitial infiltrates, but there were no significant associations between radiological and etiological findings.
Conclusions:
CRP, WBC count, PCT and ESR or their combinations have a limited role in screening between bacterial and viral pediatric CAP. If all or most of these markers are elevated, bacterial etiology is highly probable, but low values do not rule out bacterial etiology.
Insights
Diagnosing pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is challenging. While elevated inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell (WBC) count, procalcitonin (PCT), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) suggest bacterial infection, low values do not exclude it.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric infectious diseases
- Clinical microbiology
- Diagnostic immunology
Background:
- Distinguishing between bacterial and viral pediatric community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is clinically challenging.
- Accurate microbial diagnosis is crucial for appropriate antibiotic stewardship.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the utility of four non-specific inflammatory markers (serum procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and white blood cell (WBC) count) in identifying bacterial etiology in pediatric CAP.
- To evaluate the combined diagnostic performance of these markers, with or without chest radiological findings.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 101 children with radiographically confirmed CAP was studied.
- Serum levels of PCT, CRP, ESR, and WBC counts were measured.
- Etiological diagnosis was established in 67% of cases using a serological test panel.
Main Results:
- Combinations of elevated CRP, WBC, PCT, and ESR showed moderate likelihood ratios (LR+ 2.7-3.9) for distinguishing bacterial from viral CAP.
- Higher marker thresholds (e.g., CRP > 200 mg/L) increased LR+ values, significantly altering disease probability.
- Alveolar infiltrates on chest X-ray correlated with higher inflammatory marker levels, but no significant association was found between radiological patterns and specific etiologies.
Conclusions:
- Non-specific inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC, PCT, ESR) and their combinations have limited but potentially useful roles in screening for bacterial CAP in children.
- Elevated levels of multiple markers increase the probability of bacterial etiology, but normal or low values cannot definitively rule out bacterial infection.
Related Concept Videos
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Pneumonia I: Introduction
Risk Factors
Various factors influence the likelihood of developing pneumonia. Age plays a crucial role, with infants, children under two, and individuals over 65 at increased risk due to their...
Atypical Pneumonia
Pneumonia II: Pathophysiology
Pneumonia III: Complications and Assessment
Respiratory Syncytial Virus Disease
