Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Issues in the design of trials comparing management strategies for heavily pretreated patients
Andrew N Phillips1, Cal Cohen, Jens D Lundgren
1Royal Free Centre for HIV Medicine and Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, London, UK. a.phillips@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Purpose Of Review:
Strategies for the optimal management of heavily pretreated patients with multiple drug resistance mutations in whom viral suppression is not possible are not well defined. Trials of strategic management approaches (as opposed to testing the effect of one specific drug) in this area have been mainly limited to evaluating treatment interruptions, testing the benefits of multidrug ('mega-highly active antiretroviral therapy') regimens, and evaluating the use of resistance test data for choosing new regimens.
Recent Findings:
Treatment interruption before the start of a new regimen has been found to be detrimental, in terms of the risk of clinical disease, compared with no interruption. Mega-highly active antiretroviral therapy has not yet convincingly been shown to improve overall outcomes. The use of genotypic resistance testing has been shown to be useful when constructing a new regimen.
Summary:
Several challenges exist in designing future strategic trials in this area. These include the formulation of suitable new strategies which are generalizable across specific drugs and drug classes, the choice of suitable and feasible endpoints, and the incorporation of sufficient flexibility (so that patients are not too constrained to commit to entry) without compromising the ability to answer the question.
Insights
For heavily pretreated patients with drug-resistant HIV, treatment interruptions are harmful. Genotypic resistance testing aids in selecting new regimens, but optimal management strategies require further research.
Area of Science:
- Antiviral Therapy Research
- HIV Management Strategies
- Drug Resistance Studies
Background:
- Optimal management for heavily pretreated HIV patients with multidrug resistance and unattainable viral suppression is unclear.
- Previous trials focused on treatment interruptions, multidrug regimens, or resistance testing for regimen selection.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review current strategies for managing HIV patients with multidrug resistance.
- To identify challenges and future directions for clinical trials in this patient population.
Main Methods:
- Review of existing literature on strategic management approaches for drug-resistant HIV.
- Analysis of trial outcomes related to treatment interruptions, multidrug regimens, and genotypic resistance testing.
Main Results:
- Treatment interruption before a new regimen increases the risk of clinical disease compared to no interruption.
- Multidrug ('mega-highly active antiretroviral therapy') regimens have not definitively improved overall outcomes.
- Genotypic resistance testing is a valuable tool for selecting new antiretroviral regimens.
Conclusions:
- Designing future trials for drug-resistant HIV management faces challenges in strategy generalizability, endpoint selection, and trial flexibility.
- Further research is needed to establish optimal, adaptable management strategies for these complex cases.
Related Concept Videos
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Psychosis: Goals of Pharmacotherapy
Clinical Trials: Overview
Drug Therapy
Antianxiety Medications