Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
12:55
Multimodal Protocol for Assessing Metacognition and Self-Regulation in Adults with Learning Difficulties
Published on: September 27, 2020
Utility of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale
Clare Davis1, Stephen Kellett, Nigel Beail
1Nottingham University, UK.
Summary
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) has questionable validity and reliability for individuals with intellectual disabilities. Further research is needed to adapt or create new self-esteem measures for this population.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Psychometrics
- Intellectual Disabilities Research
Background:
- The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is widely used to assess self-esteem.
- Its application in individuals with intellectual disabilities lacks robust evidence of validity and reliability.
- Concerns exist regarding the scale's suitability for this specific population.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the psychometric properties of the RSES in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
- To evaluate the validity and reliability of the RSES for assessing self-esteem in this group.
- To identify specific issues with the RSES when used with people with intellectual disabilities.
Main Methods:
- Factor analysis was employed to examine the structure of the RSES.
- Psychometric foundations were analyzed using a sample of 219 participants with intellectual disabilities.
- Temporal and internal reliability, as well as criterion validity, were assessed.
Main Results:
- Factor analysis revealed two factors: Self-Worth and Self-Criticism.
- Specific items (RSES Items 5 and 8) presented notable issues.
- The RSES demonstrated moderate temporal and internal reliability, but poor criterion validity.
Conclusions:
- The RSES exhibits limitations in validity and reliability for individuals with intellectual disabilities.
- Consideration should be given to developing a new self-esteem measure tailored for this population.
- Alternatively, redesigning and simplifying the RSES may enhance its face validity in intellectual disability samples.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Need for Self-Esteem
The human need for self-esteem has long intrigued psychologists, leading to the development of several theories that explore its evolutionary and functional significance. Among the most influential are the sociometer, hierometer, and terror management theories. Each offers a unique perspective on why people strive for self-worth and how it shapes behavior and social interaction.Sociometer TheoryAccording to sociometer theory, self-esteem functions as an internal gauge of social acceptance. It...
01:28Self-Esteem
Self-esteem, a core aspect of psychological well-being, reflects an individual's positive and negative self-evaluation in terms of worth, competence, and overall value. It is both a stable trait and a dynamic process, influenced by experiences and social interactions across the lifespan. While global self-esteem offers a general assessment, research highlights that self-esteem is multidimensional and varies across specific life domains.Domain-Specific Self-EsteemResearchers have delineated...
01:25Benefits of Self-Esteem
Self-esteem—an individual's overall evaluation of their worth—plays a complex role in psychological functioning and well-being. It is often associated with many positive traits, such as confidence, optimism, and perseverance. Individuals with high self-esteem typically experience better sleep, manage peer pressure more effectively, and report greater life satisfaction. Conversely, low self-esteem has been consistently linked with increased risks of depression, anxiety, and poor academic or...
01:27Sources of Self-Esteem III: Social Comparison
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...
01:22Self-Report Tests of Personality
Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.
01:24Sources of Self-Esteem II: Performance Feedback
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem: self-efficacy,...