Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Preclinical Drug Testing in Scalable 3D Engineered Muscle Tissues
Published on: April 7, 2023
Maximum tolerated dose: clinical endpoint for a bygone era?
1Translational Medicine, Ortho Biotech Oncology R&D, Radnor, PA 19087, USA. ctakimot@its.jnj.com
Abstract:
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has been the classically recommended phase II dose for cytotoxic chemotherapy anticancer agents. However, the development of molecular targeted therapies with highly specific mechanisms of action has raised questions about the paradigm of dosing at the MTD. Inhibition of the molecular target may occur at dose levels substantially below those producing dose limiting toxicities. The impact of targeted therapies on our dose selection strategies has been immense; however, defining the MTD in phase I oncology trials still provides valuable information for future drug development. But, the MTD should not be selected blindly as the recommended phase II dose for efficacy testing. Optimal dose selection for targeted cancer agents needs to be evaluated using all available information collected during the early stages of drug development. Definition of the optimal dose may need to be deferred until randomized phase II trials can be conducted. Future clinical trail designs in oncology drug development need to reflect this paradigm shift.
Insights
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) is no longer the sole basis for selecting phase II doses in cancer drug development. Optimal dosing for targeted therapies requires a comprehensive evaluation beyond toxicity.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Clinical Pharmacology
- Drug Development
Background:
- The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) has historically guided phase II dose selection for cytotoxic chemotherapy.
- Molecular targeted therapies possess specific mechanisms of action, challenging the MTD paradigm.
Purpose of the Study:
- To re-evaluate the role of the MTD in phase I oncology trials for targeted therapies.
- To emphasize the need for optimal dose selection strategies for novel anticancer agents.
Main Methods:
- Review of current practices in phase I oncology trial dose determination.
- Analysis of the impact of targeted therapies on dose selection strategies.
Main Results:
- Target inhibition by molecular therapies can occur at doses below MTD.
- MTD determination in phase I trials remains valuable but should not be blindly applied for phase II recommendations.
Conclusions:
- Optimal dose selection for targeted cancer agents requires comprehensive data evaluation, potentially deferring final decisions until randomized phase II trials.
- Future oncology clinical trial designs must adapt to this paradigm shift in dose selection.
Related Concept Videos
Rational Dosage Regimen: Maintenance Dose and Loading Dose
In most cases, drugs are administered repetitively or infused continuously to maintain a steady-state concentration in the body. At a steady state,...
Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses
Dose Response Curve: Conventional Versus Nonmonotonic
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Dosage Regimen: Fixed Dose
Fixed-dose regimens can be used for various routes of administration, including intravenous (IV) injections and oral medications. For IV administration, a predetermined amount of the drug is...
Clinical Trials: Overview
