Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Surgical Swine Model of Chronic Cardiac Ischemia Treated by Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Published on: March 27, 2018
Contemporary results show repeat coronary artery bypass grafting remains a risk factor for operative mortality
Cheng-Hon Yap1, Luigi Sposato, Enoch Akowuah
1Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. cheng-hon.yap@mh.org.au
Insights
Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) has improved early outcomes, but remains a risk factor for operative mortality. Midterm survival after redo CABG is excellent and not significantly different from first-time procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Surgery
- Cardiac Surgery Outcomes
- Thoracic Surgery
Background:
- Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) outcomes are improving but vary.
- Assessing contemporary redo CABG outcomes is crucial to understand its current risk profile.
- Investigating redo status as a predictor for early complications and midterm survival.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate contemporary outcomes after redo CABG.
- To determine if redo status is a significant risk factor for early postoperative complications.
- To assess the impact of redo status on midterm survival.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of isolated CABG procedures from the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database (June 2001-May 2008).
- Logistic regression used to assess redo status as a predictor for early outcomes.
- Cox proportional hazards model used to determine midterm survival and the effect of redo status.
Main Results:
- 13,436 patients included; 458 (3.4%) underwent redo CABG.
- Redo CABG had higher operative mortality (4.8% vs 1.8%), myocardial infarction, and prolonged ventilation compared to first-time CABG, even after adjustment.
- Adjusted midterm survival was not significantly different between redo and first-time CABG groups.
Conclusions:
- Early postoperative outcomes for redo CABG are encouraging.
- Redo CABG remains a significant risk factor for operative mortality.
- Midterm survival after redo CABG is excellent.
Background:
Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo CABG) shows improving outcomes, but with varying degrees of improvement. We assessed contemporary outcomes after redo CABG to determine if redo status is still a risk factor for early postoperative complications and midterm survival.
Methods:
Isolated CABG procedures (June 1, 2001 to May 31, 2008) within the Australasian Society of Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons Cardiac Surgery Database were included. Redo status as a predictor for early outcomes was assessed with logistic regression analysis. Midterm survival was determined from the National Death Index. Effect of redo status on midterm survival was assessed using a Cox proportional hazards model.
Results:
Inclusion criteria were met by 13,436 patients, and 458 (3.4%) underwent redo CABG. Operative mortality was 4.8% for redo CABG and 1.8% for first-time CABG (p < 0.001). After adjustment, redo status remained a predictor for operative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 3.6), myocardial infarction (OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.6 to 6.0), and prolonged ventilation (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.0). Unadjusted survival was lower for the redo CABG group vs the first-time CABG group at up to 6 years (p = 0.01, log-rank test. After adjusting for differences in patient variables, redo status was not a predictor of midterm survival (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.35; p = 0.85).
Conclusions:
Early postoperative outcomes of redo CABG are encouraging. Midterm survival is excellent; however, redo remains a significant risk factor for operative mortality in contemporary practice.
More Related Videos
05:25Surgical Porcine Model of Chronic Myocardial Ischemia Treated by Exosome-laden Collagen Patch and Off-pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft
Published on: September 15, 2023
14:14Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care